Rozen Warren M, Stella Damien L, Bowden James, Taylor G Ian, Ashton Mark W
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Jack Brockhoff Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Research Unit, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Microsurgery. 2009;29(2):119-23. doi: 10.1002/micr.20590.
Imaging of the abdominal wall vasculature prior to deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforator (DIEP) flaps has been shown to significantly improve surgical outcomes. Although computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been shown to be highly accurate, it is associated with radiation exposure, and as such modalities without radiation exposure have been sought. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has been proposed as such an option. We conducted a pilot study comparing MRA with CTA and with operative findings in six consecutive patients undergoing DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. The DIEA, superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) and perforators were all assessed with each modality. We found that the DIEA and SIEA were accurately imaged with both CTA and MRA, but that while MRA could identify some major perforators, CTA was more accurate than MRA for perforator mapping. As such, while MRA does have a role in the imaging of DIEA perforators, CTA is still the preferred modality. On the basis of these findings, a larger study into the role for MRA in this setting is warranted.
腹直肌下动脉(DIEA)穿支皮瓣(DIEP)术前对腹壁血管系统进行成像已被证明可显著改善手术效果。尽管计算机断层血管造影(CTA)已被证明具有高度准确性,但它与辐射暴露相关,因此一直在寻求无辐射暴露的检查方式。磁共振血管造影(MRA)已被提议作为这样一种选择。我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,比较了MRA与CTA以及在连续6例接受DIEP皮瓣乳房重建患者中的手术发现。每种检查方式均对DIEA、腹壁浅动脉(SIEA)和穿支进行评估。我们发现,CTA和MRA均可准确显示DIEA和SIEA,但虽然MRA能够识别一些主要穿支,但在穿支定位方面CTA比MRA更准确。因此,虽然MRA在DIEA穿支成像中确实有作用,但CTA仍然是首选的检查方式。基于这些发现,有必要针对MRA在此情况下的作用开展更大规模的研究。