Offidani Massimo, Corvatta Laura, Polloni Claudia, Piersantelli Maria-Novella, Gentili Silvia, Galieni Piero, Visani Giuseppe, Alesiani Francesco, Catarini Massimo, Brunori Marino, Samori Arduino, Burattini Maurizio, Centurioni Riccardo, Ferranti Mario, Giuliodori Luciano, Candela Marco, Mele Anna, Marconi Monica, Leoni Pietro
Clinica di Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
Br J Haematol. 2009 Mar;144(5):653-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07495.x. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
Maintenance therapy was explored in multiple myeloma (MM) patients after conventional thalidomide, dexamethasone and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (ThaDD). Patients with newly or relapsed MM obtaining at least minor response after 6 ThaDD courses, were randomised to receive alpha-interferon (IFN) 3 MU 3 times a week or thalidomide 100 mg daily until relapse. Both groups also received pulsed dexamethasone 20 mg 4 d a month. Fifty-one patients were randomized in the IFN-dexamethasone (ID) arm and 52 in the thalidomide-dexamethasone (TD) arm. The characteristics of two groups were similar. A significantly better 2-years progression-free survival (PFS; 63% vs. 32%; P = 0.024) and overall survival (84% vs. 68%; P = 0.030) was observed in the thalidomide arm. In high-risk patients and in those achieving less than very good partial response after induction, TD fared better in term of PFS. Main side effects were peripheral neuropathy and constipation in TD group, fatigue, anorexia and haematological toxicity in ID arm. There was a 21% probability of discontinuation at 3 years in the thalidomide arm and 44% in the IFN arm (P = 0.014). Low-dose thalidomide plus pulsed low-dose dexamethasone after conventional thalidomide combination-based therapy was also feasible in the long term, enabling significantly better residual disease control if compared with a standard maintenance therapy.
在接受传统沙利度胺、地塞米松和聚乙二醇脂质体阿霉素(ThaDD)治疗后的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者中探索维持治疗。新诊断或复发的MM患者在接受6个疗程的ThaDD治疗后至少获得微小缓解,被随机分为两组,一组每周3次接受α-干扰素(IFN)3 MU,另一组每天接受沙利度胺100 mg,直至疾病复发。两组患者均每月4天接受20 mg地塞米松脉冲治疗。51例患者被随机分配至IFN-地塞米松(ID)组,52例被分配至沙利度胺-地塞米松(TD)组。两组患者的特征相似。沙利度胺组的2年无进展生存期(PFS;63%对32%;P = 0.024)和总生存期(84%对68%;P = 0.030)显著更好。在高危患者以及诱导治疗后未达到非常好的部分缓解的患者中。TD组在PFS方面表现更佳。TD组的主要副作用为周围神经病变和便秘,ID组为疲劳、厌食和血液学毒性。沙利度胺组在3年时停药概率为21%,IFN组为44%(P = 0.014)。在基于传统沙利度胺联合治疗后,低剂量沙利度胺加低剂量地塞米松脉冲治疗长期也是可行的,与标准维持治疗相比,能显著更好地控制残留疾病。