颈内动脉血泡样动脉瘤破裂的重建性血管内治疗

Reconstructive endovascular treatment of ruptured blood blister-like aneurysms of the internal carotid artery.

作者信息

Lee Byung-Hee, Kim Byung Moon, Park Moon Sun, Park Sung Il, Chung Eun Chul, Suh Sang Hyun, Choi Chun Sik, Won Yu Sam, Yu In Kyu

机构信息

Departments of Radiology, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2009 Mar;110(3):431-6. doi: 10.3171/2008.7.JNS08257.

Abstract

OBJECT

Ruptured blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) are rare but carry a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, BBAs are very difficult to treat surgically as well as endovascularly. The authors present their experience in treating BBAs with reconstructive endovascular methods.

METHODS

Nine ruptured BBAs in 9 consecutive patients (2 men and 7 women; mean age 50 years, range 42-57 years) were treated using reconstructive endovascular methods between January 2006 and November 2007. Treatment methods and angiographic and clinical outcomes were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

All 9 BBAs were initially treated with stent-assisted coil (SAC) embolization. This was followed by a second stent insertion using the stent-within-a-stent (SWS) technique in 3, covered stent placement in 3, and SAC embolization alone in 3. All 3 patients who underwent SWS placement had excellent outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale Score 5) with complete angiographic resolution of the BBAs. There were no treatment-related complications in the SWS group. Two of the 3 patients who received covered stents had excellent outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale Score 5) and complete occlusion of the BBA was achieved. The remaining patient who received a covered stent died of ICA rupture during the procedure. Aneurysm regrowth without rebleeding occurred in the 3 patients who underwent SAC embolization. Two of the 3 recurrent BBAs were treated with coil embolization with a second stent insertion, and as a result these belonged to the SWS group. The other recurrent BBA was treated with a covered stent. Of the 8 surviving patients, 5 underwent SWS, and 3 underwent covered stent placement. All surviving patients had excellent outcomes during the clinical follow-up period (mean 11 months, range 4-26 months); complete BBA resolution and smooth reconstruction of the affected ICA segment was shown on follow-up angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, the SWS and covered-stent techniques effectively prevented rebleeding and regrowth of the BBA without sacrifice of the ICA. The SWS and covered-stent techniques can be considered an alternative treatment option for BBAs in selected patients in whom ICA sacrifice is not feasible. Stent-assisted coiling alone seems insufficient to prevent BBA regrowth.

摘要

目的

颈内动脉血泡样动脉瘤破裂(BBAs)较为罕见,但发病率和死亡率很高。此外,BBAs的手术治疗和血管内治疗都非常困难。作者介绍了他们采用重建性血管内方法治疗BBAs的经验。

方法

2006年1月至2007年11月期间,对9例连续患者(2例男性,7例女性;平均年龄50岁,范围42 - 57岁)的9个破裂BBAs采用重建性血管内方法进行治疗。对治疗方法、血管造影和临床结果进行回顾性评估。

结果

所有9个BBAs最初均采用支架辅助弹簧圈(SAC)栓塞治疗。之后,3例采用支架套叠(SWS)技术再次置入支架,3例置入覆膜支架,3例仅采用SAC栓塞。接受SWS置入的3例患者均取得了良好的结果(格拉斯哥预后评分5分),BBAs在血管造影上完全消失。SWS组无治疗相关并发症。接受覆膜支架的3例患者中,2例取得了良好的结果(格拉斯哥预后评分5分),BBA实现了完全闭塞。其余接受覆膜支架的患者在手术过程中死于颈内动脉破裂。接受SAC栓塞的3例患者出现动脉瘤复发但未再出血。3个复发性BBAs中的2个采用弹簧圈栓塞并再次置入支架治疗,因此这2例属于SWS组。另一个复发性BBA采用覆膜支架治疗。8例存活患者中,5例接受了SWS治疗,3例接受了覆膜支架置入。所有存活患者在临床随访期间(平均11个月,范围4 - 26个月)均取得了良好的结果;随访血管造影显示BBA完全消失,受累颈内动脉段重建顺利。

结论

在本研究中,SWS和覆膜支架技术有效地防止了BBA的再出血和复发,同时未牺牲颈内动脉。对于无法牺牲颈内动脉的特定患者,SWS和覆膜支架技术可被视为BBAs的替代治疗选择。单纯支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞似乎不足以防止BBA复发。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索