Hsieh Liang-Tien, Hung Daisy L, Tzeng Ovid J-L, Lee Jun Ren, Cheng Shih-kuen
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, National Central University, Jhongli City, Taoyuan County 32001, Taiwan.
Brain Res. 2009 Jan 23;1250:190-201. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.016. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
This study examined the electrophysiological correlates of the processing of the Remember/Forget cues and the successful encoding of study items in item-method directed forgetting. Subjects engaged in an old/new recognition test and an item-method directed forgetting task. Event-related potentials (ERPs) time-locked to study items and Remember/Forget cues were compared according to the subsequent recognition performance. A reliable subsequent memory effect was elicited by the study items in the old/new recognition test. In contrast, the study items in the directed forgetting task did not yield reliable subsequent memory effects. Importantly, the Remember/Forget cues gave rise to ERPs that were predictive of the subsequent recognition performance to the study items preceding the cues. The subsequent memory effect elicited by the Remember cues was more sustained than that elicited by the Forget cues and showed distinct scalp distribution during the extended period. These results suggest that study items in the directed forgetting task are maintained in short-term memory with minimal further processing until the presentation of the Remember/Forget cues. In addition, the encoding mechanisms engaged by Remember cues and Forget cues are not entirely equivalent.
本研究考察了项目法定向遗忘中“记住/忘记”线索加工及学习项目成功编码的电生理相关性。受试者参与了旧/新再认测试和项目法定向遗忘任务。根据后续的再认表现,对与学习项目及“记住/忘记”线索锁时的事件相关电位(ERP)进行了比较。在旧/新再认测试中,学习项目引发了可靠的后续记忆效应。相比之下,定向遗忘任务中的学习项目并未产生可靠的后续记忆效应。重要的是,“记住/忘记”线索引发的ERP能够预测线索之前学习项目的后续再认表现。“记住”线索引发的后续记忆效应比“忘记”线索引发的更持久,且在延长期间表现出不同的头皮分布。这些结果表明,定向遗忘任务中的学习项目在短期记忆中保持,直到“记住/忘记”线索出现时才进行最少的进一步加工。此外,“记住”线索和“忘记”线索所涉及的编码机制并不完全等同。