• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节镜手术与开放性手术治疗踝关节融合术的疗效:一项对107例患者的比较性回顾性研究。

The outcome of arthroscopic and open surgery ankle arthrodesis: a comparative retrospective study on 107 patients.

作者信息

Nielsen Kristian Kibak, Linde Frank, Jensen Niels Christian

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;14(3):153-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2008.01.003. Epub 2008 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2008.01.003
PMID:19083634
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of arthroscopic guided ankle arthrodesis, and the results of open surgery arthrodesis in two comparable groups of patients.

METHODS

A group of 58 arthroscopic guided ankle arthrodeses was compared to a group of 49 ankles arthrodeses operated by open technique. The patients and ankles in both groups fulfilled the same criteria of inclusion except that the ankles operated by open technique had a varus/valgus malalignment exceeding 5 degrees. The pre- and postoperative treatment protocols were identical.

RESULTS

The patients in the arthroscopic group were discharged on average 2.27 days earlier than the patients operated by open technique (p<0.01). Ninety percent of the patients in the arthroscopic group and 57% in the open group showed bony union after 12 weeks (p<0.01). The rate of union after 1 year was 95% in the arthroscopic group and 84% in the open group (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic guided ankle arthrodesis represents a safe and cost saving procedure.

摘要

目的

评估关节镜引导下踝关节融合术的结果,以及在两组可比患者中开放性手术融合术的结果。

方法

将一组58例关节镜引导下踝关节融合术患者与一组49例采用开放技术进行踝关节融合术的患者进行比较。两组患者及踝关节均符合相同的纳入标准,只是采用开放技术手术的踝关节存在超过5度的内翻/外翻畸形。术前和术后治疗方案相同。

结果

关节镜组患者平均比采用开放技术手术的患者提前2.27天出院(p<0.01)。关节镜组90%的患者和开放组57%的患者在12周后显示骨愈合(p<0.01)。1年后关节镜组的愈合率为95%,开放组为84%(无统计学差异)。

结论

关节镜引导下踝关节融合术是一种安全且节省成本的手术。

相似文献

1
The outcome of arthroscopic and open surgery ankle arthrodesis: a comparative retrospective study on 107 patients.关节镜手术与开放性手术治疗踝关节融合术的疗效:一项对107例患者的比较性回顾性研究。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;14(3):153-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2008.01.003. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
2
[Effectiveness comparison between arthroscopic and open ankle arthrodeses].[关节镜下与切开踝关节融合术的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Mar;27(3):288-91.
3
Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis.关节镜下踝关节融合术
Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Jun;28(6):695-706. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0695.
4
Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: factors influencing union in 39 consecutive patients.关节镜下踝关节融合术:影响39例连续患者愈合的因素
Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Dec;27(12):1079-85. doi: 10.1177/107110070602701214.
5
Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a retrospective cost analysis.关节镜下与开放性踝关节融合术:一项回顾性成本分析。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010 May-Jun;49(3):242-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.02.019.
6
Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: are results reproducible irrespective of pre-operative deformity?关节镜下踝关节融合术:术前畸形是否会影响结果的可重复性?
Foot Ankle Surg. 2011 Dec;17(4):294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 Feb 20.
7
The effect of screw position and number on the time to union of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis.关节镜下踝关节融合术螺钉位置和数量对融合时间的影响。
Arthroscopy. 2012 Dec;28(12):1882-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.06.019. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
8
Arthroscopic arthrodesis for ankle arthritis without bone graft.不植骨的踝关节镜下踝关节融合术
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Dec 1;11(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0490-y.
9
Ankle arthrodesis. A comparison of an arthroscopic and an open method of treatment.踝关节融合术。关节镜治疗方法与开放治疗方法的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Jul(268):84-95.
10
Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis.关节镜下踝关节融合术。
Foot Ankle Clin. 2015 Mar;20(1):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2014.10.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis.关节镜下踝关节融合术治疗终末期踝关节骨关节炎
EFORT Open Rev. 2025 May 5;10(5):213-223. doi: 10.1530/EOR-2023-0100.
2
Current concepts in ankle arthrodesis.踝关节融合术的当前概念。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Sep 12;56:102537. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102537. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Terminologia Anatomica 2nd edition: perspectives from anatomy educators in the United Kingdom.第二版解剖学术语:来自英国解剖学教育者的观点。
Anat Sci Int. 2024 Sep;99(4):366-377. doi: 10.1007/s12565-024-00784-4. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
Tibio-Talo-Calcaneal Arthrodesis: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Specific Surgical Technique in 17 Cases.胫距跟关节融合术:17例特定手术技术的疗效评估
Cureus. 2024 Jun 9;16(6):e62014. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62014. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Ankle arthrodesis through minimally-invasive transfibular approach: a new surgical technique.经皮微创腓骨入路踝关节融合术:一种新的手术技术。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2483-2492. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03950-6. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
6
Role of fibular autograft in ankle arthrodesis fixed using cannulated screws: a proportional meta-analysis and systematic review.腓骨自体移植在空心螺钉固定踝关节融合术中的作用:一项比例荟萃分析和系统评价。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 30;13(1):18614. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46034-x.
7
TIBIOCALCANEAL ARTHRODESIS: A COMPARISON OF ANTERIOR APPROACH AND TRANSFIBULAR APPROACH.胫跟关节融合术:前路与经腓骨入路的比较
Acta Ortop Bras. 2023 Oct 23;31(5):e267148. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220233105e267148. eCollection 2023.
8
Comparative results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis vs. open arthrodesis in patients with diabetes-associated Charcot Neuro-Arthropathy.糖尿病相关夏科氏神经关节病患者行关节镜踝关节融合术与开放性踝关节融合术的比较结果。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Dec;33(8):3577-3584. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03592-0. Epub 2023 May 28.
9
Arthroscopic vs. Open-Ankle Arthrodesis on Fusion Rate in Ankle Osteoarthritis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.关节镜下与切开踝关节融合术治疗踝关节骨关节炎患者融合率的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2023 May 20;12(10):3574. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103574.
10
Improvement in clinical outcome and quality of life after arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in paralytic foot drop.踝关节镜下融合术治疗麻痹性足下垂的临床疗效和生活质量改善。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 14;18(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03691-y.