Suppr超能文献

比较聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2b与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a加利巴韦林治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒患者慢性丙型肝炎的随机试验。

Randomized trial comparing pegylated interferon alpha-2b versus pegylated interferon alpha-2a, both plus ribavirin, to treat chronic hepatitis C in human immunodeficiency virus patients.

作者信息

Laguno Montserrat, Cifuentes Carmen, Murillas Javier, Veloso Sergio, Larrousse Maria, Payeras Antoni, Bonet Lucia, Vidal Francese, Milinkovic Ana, Bassa Antoni, Villalonga Concha, Pérez Iñaki, Tural Cristina, Martínez-Rebollar Maria, Calvo Marta, Blanco Jose Luis, Martínez Estaban, Sánchez-Tapias Jose M, Gatell Jose M, Mallolas Jose

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2009 Jan;49(1):22-31. doi: 10.1002/hep.22598.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Although two pegylated interferons (Peg-IFN) are available to treat chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, no head-to-head comparative studies have been published. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of PEG IFN alfa-2b (PEG 2b) versus PEG IFN alfa-2a (PEG 2a), plus ribavirin (RBV). A prospective, randomized, multi-center, open-label clinical trial including 182 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients naïve for HCV therapy was performed. Patients were assigned to PEG 2b (80-150 mug/week; n = 96) or PEG 2a (180 mug/week; n = 86), plus RBV (800-1200 mg/day) for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR: negative HCV-RNA 24 weeks after completion of treatment). At baseline, both groups were well balanced: 73% male; 63% HCV genotype 1 or [corrected] 4; 29% had fibrosis index of 3 or greater. The overall SVR was 44% (42% PEG 2b versus 46% PEG 2a, P = 0.65). Among genotypes 1 or [corrected] 4, SVRs were 28% versus 32% (P = 0.67) and 62% versus 71% (P = 0.6) in genotypes 2 or [corrected] 3 for PEG 2b and PEG 2a, respectively. Early virological response (EVR; >or=2 log reduction from baseline or negative HCV-RNA at week 12) was 70% in the PEG 2b group and 80% in the PEG 2a group (P = 0.13), reaching a positive predictive value of SVR of 64% and a negative predictive value of 100% in both arms. Side effects were present in 96% of patients but led to treatment discontinuation in 10% of patients (8% on PEG 2b and 13% on PEG 2a, P = 0.47).

CONCLUSION

In patients with HIV, HCV therapy with PEG 2b or PEG 2a plus RBV had no significant differences in efficacy and safety.

摘要

未标注

虽然有两种聚乙二醇化干扰素(Peg-IFN)可用于治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染,但尚无直接比较的研究发表。我们旨在比较聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b(PEG 2b)与聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a(PEG 2a)联合利巴韦林(RBV)的疗效和安全性。进行了一项前瞻性、随机、多中心、开放标签的临床试验,纳入182例初治的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)-丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)患者。患者被分配至PEG 2b组(80 - 150微克/周;n = 96)或PEG 2a组(180微克/周;n = 86),加用RBV(800 - 1200毫克/天),疗程48周。主要终点为持续病毒学应答(SVR:治疗结束后24周HCV-RNA阴性)。基线时,两组情况均衡:73%为男性;63%为HCV基因1型或[校正后]4型;29%的纤维化指数为3或更高。总体SVR为44%(PEG 2b组为42%,PEG 2a组为46%,P = 0.65)。在基因1型或[校正后]4型中,PEG 2b组和PEG 2a组的SVR分别为28%对32%(P = 0.67),基因2型或[校正后]3型中分别为62%对71%(P = 0.6)。早期病毒学应答(EVR;自基线下降≥2 log或第12周时HCV-RNA阴性)在PEG 2b组为70%,PEG 2a组为80%(P = 0.13),两组中SVR的阳性预测值均为64%,阴性预测值均为100%。96%的患者出现副作用,但仅10% 的患者因副作用停药(PEG 2b组为8%,PEG 2a组为13%,P = 0.47)。

结论

对于HIV合并HCV感染患者,PEG 2b或PEG 2a联合RBV治疗在疗效和安全性方面无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验