Suppr超能文献

循证卫生政策 1 - 对支持研究证据使用的组织进行多方法研究结果的综合分析。

Evidence-informed health policy 1 - synthesis of findings from a multi-method study of organizations that support the use of research evidence.

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1200 Main St. West, HSC-2D3, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2008 Dec 17;3:53. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-53.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Organizations have been established in many countries and internationally to support the use of research evidence by producing clinical practice guidelines, undertaking health technology assessments, and/or directly supporting the use of research evidence in developing health policy on an international, national, and state or provincial level. Learning from these organizations can reduce the need to 'reinvent the wheel' and inform decisions about how best to organize support for such organizations, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

METHODS

We undertook a multi-method study in three phases - a survey, interviews, and case descriptions that drew on site visits - and in each of the second and third phases we focused on a purposive sample of those involved in the previous phase. We used the seven main recommendations that emerged from the advice offered in the interviews to organize much of the synthesis of findings across phases and methods. We used a constant comparative method to identify themes from across phases and methods.

RESULTS

Seven recommendations emerged for those involved in establishing or leading organizations that support the use of research evidence in developing health policy: 1) collaborate with other organizations; 2) establish strong links with policymakers and involve stakeholders in the work; 3) be independent and manage conflicts of interest among those involved in the work; 4) build capacity among those working in the organization; 5) use good methods and be transparent in the work; 6) start small, have a clear audience and scope, and address important questions; and 7) be attentive to implementation considerations, even if implementation is not a remit. Four recommendations emerged for the World Health Organization (WHO) and other international organizations and networks: 1) support collaborations among organizations; 2) support local adaptation efforts; 3) mobilize support; and 4) create global public goods.

CONCLUSION

This synthesis of findings from a multi-method study, along with the more detailed findings from each of the three phases of the study (which are reported in the three following articles in the series), provide a strong basis on which researchers, policymakers, international organizations (and networks) like WHO can respond to the growing chorus of voices calling for efforts to support the use of research evidence in developing health policy.

摘要

背景

许多国家和国际上都成立了组织,以通过制定临床实践指南、进行卫生技术评估以及/或直接支持在国际、国家和州或省一级制定卫生政策中使用研究证据,来支持研究证据的使用。借鉴这些组织的经验可以减少“重新发明轮子”的需要,并为如何最好地组织支持此类组织的决策提供信息,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。

方法

我们进行了一项多方法研究,分为三个阶段 - 调查、访谈和案例描述,并在每个第二和第三阶段都集中在参与前一阶段的有目的的样本上。我们使用访谈中提供的建议中出现的七个主要建议来组织整个研究阶段和方法的发现。我们使用恒比方法从各阶段和方法中确定主题。

结果

为那些参与建立或领导支持在制定卫生政策中使用研究证据的组织的人提出了七个建议:1)与其他组织合作;2)与政策制定者建立牢固的联系,并让利益相关者参与工作;3)独立并管理参与工作的人的利益冲突;4)在组织内培养人员能力;5)在工作中使用良好的方法并保持透明;6)从小处着手,有明确的受众和范围,并解决重要问题;7)关注实施注意事项,即使实施不是职权范围。为世界卫生组织(WHO)和其他国际组织和网络提出了四个建议:1)支持组织之间的合作;2)支持当地的适应努力;3)动员支持;4)创造全球公共产品。

结论

这项多方法研究的综合研究结果,以及研究的三个阶段中的更详细结果(在该系列中的三篇后续文章中报告),为研究人员、政策制定者、国际组织(和网络)(如 WHO)提供了强有力的基础,以回应越来越多的呼吁支持使用研究证据制定卫生政策的声音。

相似文献

3
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Research roadblocks: a cross-sectional study on barriers and perceptions among medical students in Sudan.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):1034. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07632-7.
2
Integrating eye health into a child health policy in Tanzania: global and national influences.
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Aug 18;40(7):696-707. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf029.
4
Adaptation of Research Project Requirement at Pharmacy Undergraduate Studies: Students' Perception, Attitude, and Experiences.
Scientifica (Cairo). 2024 Apr 2;2024:8144325. doi: 10.1155/2024/8144325. eCollection 2024.
9
How does explicit knowledge inform policy shaping? The case of Burkina Faso's national social protection policy.
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 27;18(4):e0284950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284950. eCollection 2023.
10
Systematic review of health promotion policies or regulations with CCAT theory.
J Public Health Res. 2023 Feb 8;12(1):22799036231153479. doi: 10.1177/22799036231153479. eCollection 2023 Jan.

本文引用的文献

4
Use of evidence in WHO recommendations.
Lancet. 2007 Jun 2;369(9576):1883-1889. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60675-8.
5
Quality of systematic reviews used in guidelines for oncology practice.
Ann Oncol. 2006 Apr;17(4):691-701. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl003. Epub 2006 Feb 6.
6
EVIPNet: translating the spirit of Mexico.
Lancet. 2005 Nov 19;366(9499):1758-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67709-4.
7
Critics slam draft WHO report on homoeopathy.
Lancet. 2005;366(9487):705-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67159-0.
8
Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:35-48. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308549.
9
Making evidence synthesis more useful for management and policy-making.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:1-5. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308521.
10
Use of research to inform public policymaking.
Lancet. 2004;364(9445):1615-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17317-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验