Suppr超能文献

在患有特发性扩张型心肌病且植入式心脏复律除颤器用于二级预防的患者中,诱发心室颤动而非室性心动过速可预测快速性心律失常复发。

Induction of ventricular fibrillation rather than ventricular tachycardia predicts tachyarrhythmia recurrences in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter defibrillator for secondary prophylaxis.

作者信息

Rolf Sascha, Haverkamp Wilhelm, Borggrefe Martin, Breithardt Guenter, Bocker Dirk

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13553 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Europace. 2009 Mar;11(3):289-96. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun330. Epub 2008 Dec 18.

Abstract

AIMS

We sought to investigate the association of inducibility of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (PVT/VF) or sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) at standardized programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) with the long-term likelihood of sudden death and/or fast VT in a large cohort of patients with idiopathic non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for secondary prophylaxis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 1994 and 2007, 160 consecutive patients with DCM and spontaneous sustained VT/VF or cardiac arrest underwent PVS prior to ICD implantation. Outcome data, particularly probability of survival without (sudden) death or appropriate ICD therapies for fast VT, were assessed during long-term follow-up. PVT/VF was induced in 50 (31%) and SMVT in 30 (19%) patients. During a mean follow-up of 53 +/- 15 months, we observed 19/50 (38%), 10/30 (33%), and 14/80 (18%) deaths in the PVT/VF, SMVT, and non-inducible group, respectively. These deaths were sudden in 7/50 (14%), 2/30 (7%), and 0/80 (0%) of patients, respectively. At least one fast VT was treated by the ICD in 26/50 (52%), 6/30 (20%), and 22/80 (28%) patients, respectively. PVT/VF but not SMVT-inducible patients had a significantly worse overall survival (log-rank P = 0.013), survival without sudden cardiac death (P < 0.01), or survival without fast VT (P < 0.01) according to Kaplan-Meier method than non-inducible patients. Additionally, survival free of fast VT was significantly worse in PVT/VF vs. SMVT-inducible patients (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Inducibility of PVT/VF is a much stronger predictor of recurrences of fast VT as opposed to SMVT induction in DCM patients with ICD for secondary prevention.

摘要

目的

我们试图在一大群患有特发性非缺血性扩张型心肌病(DCM)并植入植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)进行二级预防的患者中,研究标准化心室程序刺激(PVS)时多形性室性心动过速或室颤(PVT/VF)或持续性单形性室性心动过速(SMVT)的可诱导性与猝死和/或快速室性心动过速长期发生可能性之间的关联。

方法与结果

1994年至2007年间,160例连续的患有DCM且有自发持续性室性心动过速/室颤或心脏骤停的患者在植入ICD之前接受了PVS。在长期随访期间评估结局数据,尤其是无(猝死)死亡或针对快速室性心动过速进行适当ICD治疗的生存概率。50例(31%)患者诱发出PVT/VF,30例(19%)患者诱发出SMVT。在平均53±15个月的随访期间,我们分别在PVT/VF组、SMVT组和非诱发性组中观察到19/50(38%)、10/30(33%)和14/80(18%)例死亡。这些死亡分别在7/50(14%)、2/30(7%)和0/80(0%)的患者中为猝死。分别有26/50(52%)、6/30(20%)和22/80(28%)的患者至少有一次快速室性心动过速接受了ICD治疗。根据Kaplan-Meier方法,与非诱发性患者相比,PVT/VF但非SMVT诱发性患者的总体生存率(对数秩检验P = 0.013)、无心脏性猝死生存率(P < 0.01)或无快速室性心动过速生存率(P < 0.01)显著更差。此外,PVT/VF组与SMVT诱发性患者相比,无快速室性心动过速的生存率显著更差(P < 0.01)。

结论

在接受ICD二级预防的DCM患者中,PVT/VF的可诱导性是快速室性心动过速复发的更强预测指标,而不是SMVT的诱导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验