Dias Raquel, Timmers Luis Fernando Saraiva Macedo, Caceres Rafael Andrade, de Azevedo Walter Filgueira
Faculdade de Biociências, Laboratório de Bioquímica Estrutural, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Curr Drug Targets. 2008 Dec;9(12):1062-70. doi: 10.2174/138945008786949450.
Molecular docking simulations are of pivotal importance for analysis of protein-ligand interactions and also an essential resource for virtual-screening initiatives. In molecular docking simulations several possible docked structures are generated, which create an ensemble of structures representing binary complexes. Therefore, it is crucial to find the best solution for the simulation. One approach to this problem is to employ empirical scoring function to identify the best docked structure. It is expected that scoring functions show a descriptive funnel-shaped energy surface without many false minima to impair the efficiency of conformational sampling. We employed this methodology against a test set with 300 docked structures. Docking simulations of these ligands against enzyme binding pocket indicated a funnel-shaped behavior of the complexation for this system. This review compares a set of recently proposed polynomial empirical scoring functions, implemented in a program called POLSCORE, with two popular scoring function programs (XSCORE and DrugScore). Overall comparison indicated that POLSCORE works better to predict the correct docked position, for the ensemble of docked structures analyzed in the present work.
分子对接模拟对于分析蛋白质 - 配体相互作用至关重要,也是虚拟筛选计划的重要资源。在分子对接模拟中,会生成几种可能的对接结构,这些结构构成了代表二元复合物的结构集合。因此,找到模拟的最佳解决方案至关重要。解决这个问题的一种方法是使用经验评分函数来识别最佳对接结构。预计评分函数会显示出描述性的漏斗形能量表面,没有太多错误的极小值来损害构象采样的效率。我们针对一个包含300个对接结构的测试集采用了这种方法。这些配体与酶结合口袋的对接模拟表明该系统的络合具有漏斗形行为。本综述将一组最近提出的多项式经验评分函数(在名为POLSCORE的程序中实现)与两个流行的评分函数程序(XSCORE和DrugScore)进行了比较。总体比较表明,对于本工作中分析的对接结构集合,POLSCORE在预测正确的对接位置方面表现更好。