Schütze Stefan, Schneider-Brachert Wulf
Institute of Immunology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Michaelisstr. 5, D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Results Probl Cell Differ. 2009;49:63-85. doi: 10.1007/400_2008_23.
Internalization of cell surface receptors has long been regarded as a pure means to terminate signaling via receptor degradation. A growing body of information points to the fact that many internalized receptors are still in their active state and that signaling continues along the endocytic pathway. Thus endocytosis orchestrates cell signaling by coupling and integrating different cascades on the surface of endocytic vesicles to control the quality, duration, intensity, and distribution of signaling events. The death receptors tumor necrosis factor-receptor 1 (TNF-R1) and CD95 (Fas, APO-1) are known not only to signal for cell death via apoptosis but are also capable of inducing antiapoptotic signals via transcription factor NF-kappaB induction or activation of the proliferative mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase) protein kinase cascades, resulting in cell protection and tissue regeneration. A clue to the understanding of these contradictory biological phenomena may arise from recent findings which reveal a regulatory role of receptor internalization and intracellular receptor trafficking in selectively transmitting signals, which lead either to apoptosis or to the survival of the cell. In this chapter, we discuss the dichotomy of pro- and antiapoptotic signaling of the death receptors TNF-R1 and CD95. First, we will address the role of lipid rafts and post-translational modifications of death receptors in regulating the formation of receptor complexes. Then, we will discuss the role of internalization in determining the fate of the receptors and subsequently the specificity of signaling events. We propose that fusion of internalized TNF-receptosomes with trans-Golgi vesicles should be recognized as a novel mechanism to transduce death signals along the endocytic route. Finally, the lessons learnt from the strategy of adenovirus to escape apoptosis by targeting death receptor internalization demonstrate the biological significance of TNF receptor compartmentalization for immunosurveillance.
长期以来,细胞表面受体的内化一直被视为通过受体降解来终止信号传导的一种纯粹方式。越来越多的信息表明,许多内化的受体仍处于活性状态,并且信号传导会沿着内吞途径持续进行。因此,内吞作用通过在内吞小泡表面偶联和整合不同的信号级联反应来协调细胞信号传导,从而控制信号事件的质量、持续时间、强度和分布。死亡受体肿瘤坏死因子受体1(TNF-R1)和CD95(Fas,APO-1)不仅已知可通过凋亡发出细胞死亡信号,还能够通过转录因子NF-κB的诱导或增殖性丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)/细胞外信号调节激酶(ERK)蛋白激酶级联反应的激活来诱导抗凋亡信号,从而导致细胞保护和组织再生。对这些相互矛盾的生物学现象的理解线索可能来自最近的发现,这些发现揭示了受体内化和细胞内受体运输在选择性传递信号中的调节作用,这些信号要么导致细胞凋亡,要么导致细胞存活。在本章中,我们将讨论死亡受体TNF-R1和CD95的促凋亡和抗凋亡信号传导的二分法。首先,我们将探讨脂筏和死亡受体的翻译后修饰在调节受体复合物形成中的作用。然后,我们将讨论内化在决定受体命运以及随后信号事件特异性方面的作用。我们提出,内化的TNF-受体小体与反式高尔基体小泡的融合应被视为一种沿着内吞途径转导死亡信号的新机制。最后,从腺病毒通过靶向死亡受体内化来逃避凋亡的策略中吸取的教训证明了TNF受体区室化对免疫监视的生物学意义。