Stessl Martina, Noe Christian R, Lachmann Bodo
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Vienna, Austria.
Electrophoresis. 2009 Jan;30(2):325-8. doi: 10.1002/elps.200800213.
Image analysis of two-dimensional gels is a crucial step in a proteomic workflow and has a direct impact on obtained qualitative and quantitative data. Since the analysis is a complex process and creates large data amounts, the use of a respective software is inevitable. There are only a few papers published addressing the issue of analysis-based variance; therefore, our aim was to highlight the discrepancy of received results when different commercially available image-tools are used for gel analysis especially in terms of comparability of the obtained outcome when the same digital image set is used. A set of six gels (three replicates per group) of real-life samples was created and examined with two different versions of PD-Quest (Bio-Rad) (version 6.1 and its update version 8.0) and with an external image-tool Delta 2D (Decodon) (version 3.6). Replicate groups were analyzed and compared with each other with regard to volume ratios of a group of significantly changed spots. The study points out significant variations among results depending on the software package used, underlining the importance of a careful investigation of post-experimental processes to receive comparable and reliable results.
二维凝胶图像分析是蛋白质组学工作流程中的关键步骤,对所获得的定性和定量数据有直接影响。由于该分析过程复杂且会产生大量数据,因此使用相应软件是不可避免的。关于基于分析的差异问题,仅有少数论文发表;因此,我们的目的是突出当使用不同的商用图像工具进行凝胶分析时,尤其是在使用同一数字图像集时所获得结果的可比性方面,所得到结果的差异。我们创建了一组来自实际样本的六块凝胶(每组三个重复),并使用两种不同版本的PD-Quest(伯乐公司)(6.1版及其更新版本8.0)以及外部图像工具Delta 2D(德科东公司)(3.6版)进行检测。对重复组进行分析,并就一组显著变化斑点的体积比相互比较。该研究指出,结果存在显著差异,这取决于所使用的软件包,强调了仔细研究实验后过程以获得可比且可靠结果的重要性。