Ford Kristen A, Gati Joseph S, Menon Ravi S, Everling Stefan
Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Neuroimage. 2009 Apr 1;45(2):470-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.009. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
Most of our knowledge about the functional organization of the nonhuman primate brain has come from single neuron recordings, whereas functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has rapidly become the method of choice for the study of the human brain. In some cases these two methods have resulted in conflicting models of frontal lobe function. Based on the finding that the frontal eye fields (FEF) exhibit a higher blood-oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) activation for anti-saccades compared with pro-saccades, it has been proposed that this area is more involved in voluntary than automatic saccade generation. This model has been questioned by the finding of decreased single neuron activity in FEF for anti-compared with pro-saccades in monkeys. To reconcile these findings, we employed fMRI to compare BOLD activation between anti-saccades and pro-saccades in monkeys. FEF and a number of other cortical and subcortical areas showed an increased activation for anti-saccades. The results indicate that previous contrary findings between single neuron recordings and fMRI were due to differences between these techniques and were not related to differences between the two primate species.
我们关于非人类灵长类动物大脑功能组织的大部分知识来自单神经元记录,而功能磁共振成像(fMRI)已迅速成为研究人类大脑的首选方法。在某些情况下,这两种方法得出了相互矛盾的额叶功能模型。基于额叶眼区(FEF)与顺向扫视相比,在反扫视时表现出更高的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)激活这一发现,有人提出该区域在自愿产生扫视方面比自动产生扫视方面发挥更大作用。猴子中FEF区域反扫视与顺向扫视相比单神经元活动减少这一发现对该模型提出了质疑。为了协调这些发现我们利用fMRI比较了猴子反扫视和顺向扫视之间的BOLD激活情况。FEF以及其他一些皮质和皮质下区域在反扫视时显示出激活增加。结果表明,之前单神经元记录和fMRI之间的相反发现是由于这些技术之间存在差异,而非与这两种灵长类动物之间的差异有关。