Oliveira Sara M, Gewehr Camila, Dalmolin Gerusa D, Cechinel Cleber A, Wentz Alexandre, Lourega Rogério V, Sehnem Ronan C, Zanatta Nilo, Martins Marcos A P, Rubin Maribel A, Bonacorso Helio G, Ferreira Juliano
Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Neurotoxicity and Psychopharmacology, Center of Natural and Exact Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2009 Feb;104(2):122-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2008.00353.x. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
Pain is the most common complaint in the medical field and the identification of compounds that can effectively treat painful states without induction of side-effects remains a major challenge in biomedical research. The aim of the present study was to investigate the antinociceptive effect of a novel compound, 3-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-trifluoromethyl-1H-1-tosylpyrazole (compound A) in several models of pain in mice and compare with those produced by the known trifluoromethyl-containing pyrazole compound celecoxib. Compound A or celecoxib were administrated by oral (78-780 micromol/kg), intrathecal (9-22.5 nmol/site) or intracerebroventricular (9-22.5 nmol/site) routes. Oral administration of either compound A or celecoxib abolished the mechanical allodynia, but not the oedema caused by intraplantar injection of carrageenan. Similarly, compound A reduced the overt nociception, but not the oedema, produced by bradykinin or capsaicin. However, compound A (500 micromol/kg, orally) did not alter nociception nor oedema caused by intraplantar injection of prostaglandin E(2 )or glutamate, whereas celecoxib reduced only the nociception induced by the former. Moreover, oral and intrathecal administration of compound A or celecoxib also reduced the nociception induced by acetic acid. However, only celecoxib reduced the acetic acid-induced nociception when it was injected by the intracerebroventricular route. Finally, neither compound A nor celecoxib was able to produce antinociceptive effect in the tail-flick test or to alter the motor performance and the body temperature. Besides, compound A or celecoxib did not induce gastric lesion. Thus, compound A seems to be an interesting prototype for the development of novel analgesic drugs.
疼痛是医学领域最常见的主诉,鉴定能够有效治疗疼痛状态而不产生副作用的化合物仍然是生物医学研究中的一项重大挑战。本研究的目的是在几种小鼠疼痛模型中研究新型化合物3-(4-氟苯基)-5-三氟甲基-1H-1-甲苯磺酰基吡唑(化合物A)的抗伤害感受作用,并与已知的含三氟甲基的吡唑化合物塞来昔布所产生的作用进行比较。化合物A或塞来昔布通过口服(78 - 780微摩尔/千克)、鞘内注射(9 - 22.5纳摩尔/部位)或脑室内注射(9 - 22.5纳摩尔/部位)途径给药。口服化合物A或塞来昔布均可消除机械性异常性疼痛,但不能消除足底注射角叉菜胶引起的水肿。同样,化合物A可减轻缓激肽或辣椒素引起的明显伤害感受,但不能减轻水肿。然而,化合物A(500微摩尔/千克,口服)不会改变足底注射前列腺素E2或谷氨酸引起的伤害感受和水肿,而塞来昔布仅能减轻前者诱导的伤害感受。此外,口服和鞘内注射化合物A或塞来昔布也可减轻乙酸诱导的伤害感受。然而,当通过脑室内注射途径给药时,只有塞来昔布能减轻乙酸诱导的伤害感受。最后,化合物A和塞来昔布均不能在甩尾试验中产生抗伤害感受作用,也不会改变运动能力和体温。此外,化合物A或塞来昔布不会诱导胃损伤。因此,化合物A似乎是开发新型镇痛药的一个有趣的原型。