Bengali Zain, Rea Jennifer C, Gibly Romie F, Shea Lonnie D
Department of Interdepartmental Biological Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Apr 15;102(6):1679-91. doi: 10.1002/bit.22212.
Non-viral gene delivery by immobilization of complexes to cell-adhesive biomaterials, a process termed substrate-mediated delivery, has many in vitro research applications such as transfected cell arrays or models of tissue growth. In this report, we quantitatively investigate the efficiency of gene delivery by surface immobilization, and compare this efficiency to the more typical bolus delivery. The ability to immobilize vectors while allowing cellular internalization is impacted by the biomaterial and vector properties. Thus, to compare this efficiency between vector types and delivery methods, transfection conditions were initially identified that maximized transgene expression. For surface delivery from tissue culture polystyrene, DNA complexes were immobilized to pre-adsorbed serum proteins prior to cell seeding, while for bolus delivery, complexes were added to the media above adherent cells. Mathematical modeling of vector binding, release, and cell association using a two-site model indicated that the kinetics of polyplex binding to cells was faster than for lipoplexes, yet both vectors have a half-life on the surface of approximately 17 min. For bolus and surface delivery, the majority of the DNA in the system remained in solution or on the surface, respectively. For polyplexes, the efficiency of trafficking of cell-associated polyplexes to the nucleus for surface delivery is similar or less than bolus delivery, suggesting that surface immobilization may decrease the activity of the complex. The efficiency of nuclear association for cell-associated lipoplexes is similar or greater for surface delivery relative to bolus. These studies suggest that strategies to enhance surface delivery for polyplexes should target the vector design to enhance its potency, whereas enhancing lipoplex delivery should target the material design to increase internalization.
通过将复合物固定在细胞粘附生物材料上来进行非病毒基因递送,这一过程称为底物介导递送,具有许多体外研究应用,如转染细胞阵列或组织生长模型。在本报告中,我们定量研究了表面固定化基因递送的效率,并将其与更典型的推注式递送效率进行比较。在允许细胞内化的同时固定载体的能力受生物材料和载体特性的影响。因此,为了比较不同载体类型和递送方法之间的这种效率,最初确定了能使转基因表达最大化的转染条件。对于从组织培养聚苯乙烯进行表面递送,在细胞接种前将DNA复合物固定在预先吸附的血清蛋白上,而对于推注式递送,则将复合物添加到贴壁细胞上方的培养基中。使用双位点模型对载体结合、释放和细胞结合进行的数学建模表明,多聚体与细胞结合的动力学比脂质体更快,但两种载体在表面的半衰期均约为17分钟。对于推注式和表面递送,系统中的大部分DNA分别保留在溶液中或表面上。对于多聚体,细胞相关多聚体向细胞核转运以进行表面递送的效率与推注式递送相似或更低,这表明表面固定化可能会降低复合物的活性。相对于推注式递送,细胞相关脂质体进行表面递送时核结合的效率相似或更高。这些研究表明,增强多聚体表面递送的策略应针对载体设计以提高其效力,而增强脂质体递送则应针对材料设计以增加内化。