Guzzetta Nina A, Evans Faye M, Rosenberg Eli S, Fazlollah Tom M, Baker Michael J, Wilson Elizabeth C, Kaiser Anna M, Tosone Steven R, Miller Bruce E
Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2009 Feb;108(2):448-55. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318194007a.
Recent concern about the safety of aprotinin administration to adults has led to its suspension from worldwide markets. However, few studies have examined its safety in pediatric patients. Studies in children evaluating aprotinin's safety have been hindered by the heterogeneity of pediatric patients and the inconsistency of clinical protocols. In this investigation, we retrospectively reviewed 200 neonatal cardiac surgical cases performed at our institution to examine the safety of aprotinin, focusing on postoperative renal dysfunction, using a consistent aprotinin dosing protocol.
Two-hundred consecutive neonates scheduled for palliative or corrective congenital cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) from January 1, 2005 through February 28, 2007 were included in this retrospective investigation. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Markers of safety included 72-h postoperative renal dysfunction, need for dialysis (peritoneal or hemodialysis), thrombosis and in-hospital mortality.
Neonates were divided into those who received aprotinin (aprotinin group; n = 156) and those who did not (no aprotinin group; n = 44). Twenty-four and 72-h postoperative serum creatinine levels were significantly greater than baseline levels in both groups. The degree of change in creatinine levels was highly significant and similar between the two groups. A larger percentage of neonates in the aprotinin group developed renal dysfunction, although this difference was not statistically significant. Stepwise logistic regression, assessing the impact on renal dysfunction of all variables that indicated significance between neonates who did or did not receive aprotinin and between neonates who did or did not develop renal dysfunction, identified CPB time and age as significant predictors of postoperative renal dysfunction. All neonates who developed postoperative renal dysfunction had a CPB time of more than 100 min regardless of the use of aprotinin. Additionally, using this subset, similar percentages of renal dysfunction occurred in both groups. A second multivariable regression analysis to simultaneously account for the predictors of CPB time, age and aprotinin administration found CPB time to be the only significant predictor of renal dysfunction. Incidences of postoperative dialysis, postoperative thrombosis and in-hospital mortality were not statistically significantly different between the aprotinin and the no aprotinin groups.
The occurrence of postoperative renal dysfunction in neonates was more significantly predicted by the duration of CPB than by the intraoperative administration of aprotinin. CPB times of more than 100 min appeared to be a critical marker for the development of postoperative renal dysfunction. Randomized prospective trials are needed to confirm the validity of our retrospective findings.
近期对成人使用抑肽酶安全性的担忧导致其在全球市场被停用。然而,很少有研究考察其在儿科患者中的安全性。评估抑肽酶安全性的儿童研究受到儿科患者异质性和临床方案不一致性的阻碍。在本研究中,我们回顾性分析了在我院进行的200例新生儿心脏手术病例,采用一致的抑肽酶给药方案,以考察抑肽酶的安全性,重点关注术后肾功能不全。
本回顾性研究纳入了2005年1月1日至2007年2月28日期间计划进行姑息性或矫正性先天性心脏手术且需要体外循环(CPB)的200例连续新生儿。收集并分析术前、术中和术后数据。安全性指标包括术后72小时肾功能不全、透析需求(腹膜透析或血液透析)、血栓形成和住院死亡率。
新生儿被分为接受抑肽酶治疗的组(抑肽酶组;n = 156)和未接受抑肽酶治疗的组(无抑肽酶组;n = 44)。两组术后24小时和72小时的血清肌酐水平均显著高于基线水平。两组肌酐水平的变化程度高度显著且相似。抑肽酶组中发生肾功能不全的新生儿比例更高,尽管这种差异无统计学意义。逐步逻辑回归分析评估了所有变量对肾功能不全的影响,这些变量在接受或未接受抑肽酶治疗的新生儿之间以及发生或未发生肾功能不全的新生儿之间显示出显著性,结果确定CPB时间和年龄是术后肾功能不全的显著预测因素。所有发生术后肾功能不全的新生儿,无论是否使用抑肽酶,CPB时间均超过100分钟。此外,在这个亚组中,两组肾功能不全的发生率相似。第二项多变量回归分析同时考虑了CPB时间、年龄和抑肽酶给药的预测因素,发现CPB时间是肾功能不全的唯一显著预测因素。抑肽酶组和无抑肽酶组术后透析、术后血栓形成和住院死亡率的发生率无统计学显著差异。
与术中使用抑肽酶相比,CPB持续时间对新生儿术后肾功能不全发生的预测作用更为显著。CPB时间超过100分钟似乎是术后肾功能不全发生的关键指标。需要进行随机前瞻性试验来证实我们回顾性研究结果的有效性。