Ekhart Corine, Rodenhuis Sjoerd, Beijnen Jos H, Huitema Alwin D R
Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ther Drug Monit. 2009 Feb;31(1):95-103. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e318194e484.
High-dose alkylating chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (4000 or 6000 mg/m2) and thiotepa (320 or 480 mg/m2) has commonly been administered in a fractionated regimen over 4 days. A simplified unfractionated regimen would be preferable, especially because cyclophosphamide and thiotepa have been shown to influence the metabolism of each other. However, altering a dose regimen can have a profound effect on the pharmacokinetics of the compounds involved. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of altering the fractionated administration schedule of the CTC regimen on cyclophosphamide and thiotepa pharmacokinetics. Plasma samples were collected from 124 patients who received a fractionated tiny CTC or CTC regimen of cyclophosphamide (1000 or 1500 mg m(-2) d(-1)), thiotepa (40 or 60 mg/m2 twice daily), and carboplatin (267 or 400 mg m(-2) day(-1)) for 4 days, and 16 patients who received an unfractionated mini CTC regimen of cyclophosphamide (3000 mg/m2 at day 1), carboplatin (400 mg/m2 at days 1 and 2), and thiotepa (250 mg/m2 at day 2). Plasma concentrations of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometric detection; plasma concentrations of thiotepa and tepa were determined using gas chromatography. Pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa were assessed using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. The study showed that alteration of a fractionated high-dose regimen into a simplified unfractionated regimen resulted in saturation of thiotepa elimination, with a Vmax of 212 (+/-58) micromol/h and a Km of 13.7 (+/-5.9) microM. This resulted in an increased dose-corrected exposure to thiotepa (13%) and decreased dose-corrected exposure to its metabolite tepa (21%). Elimination of cyclophosphamide was not shown to be saturable. Dose-corrected exposures to cyclophosphamide and its active metabolite 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide were comparable in both regimens. Because the simplified unfractionated mini CTC regimen was more patient-friendly and because overall dose-corrected exposures to cyclophosphamide and thiotepa were not affected to a relevant extent, our data suggest that this unfractionated regimen can be used safely in future studies.
常用的大剂量烷化剂化疗方案是在4天内分阶段给予环磷酰胺(4000或6000mg/m²)和塞替派(320或480mg/m²)。简化的非分阶段方案会更可取,特别是因为环磷酰胺和塞替派已被证明会相互影响代谢。然而,改变给药方案可能会对相关化合物的药代动力学产生深远影响。本研究的目的是调查改变环磷酰胺、塞替派和卡铂(CTC)方案的分阶段给药时间表对环磷酰胺和塞替派药代动力学的影响。从124例接受分阶段小剂量CTC或环磷酰胺(1000或1500mg m⁻² d⁻¹)、塞替派(40或60mg/m²,每日两次)和卡铂(267或400mg m⁻² day⁻¹)4天化疗方案的患者以及16例接受非分阶段小剂量CTC方案(第1天给予环磷酰胺3000mg/m²、第1天和第2天给予卡铂400mg/m²、第2天给予塞替派250mg/m²)的患者中采集血浆样本。使用高效液相色谱-串联质谱检测法测定环磷酰胺和4-羟基环磷酰胺的血浆浓度;使用气相色谱法测定塞替派和替派的血浆浓度。采用非线性混合效应模型评估环磷酰胺和塞替派的药代动力学。研究表明,将分阶段大剂量方案改为简化的非分阶段方案会导致塞替派消除饱和,Vmax为212(±58)μmol/h,Km为13.7(±5.9)μM。这导致塞替派的剂量校正暴露增加(13%),其代谢产物替派的剂量校正暴露减少(21%)。未显示环磷酰胺的消除存在饱和现象。两种方案中环磷酰胺及其活性代谢产物4-羟基环磷酰胺的剂量校正暴露相当。由于简化的非分阶段小剂量CTC方案对患者更友好,且环磷酰胺和塞替派的总体剂量校正暴露在相关程度上未受影响,我们的数据表明,这种非分阶段方案可在未来研究中安全使用。