Lahat Guy, Madewell John E, Anaya Daniel A, Qiao Wei, Tuvin Daniel, Benjamin Robert S, Lev Dina C, Pollock Ralphael E
Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;115(5):1081-90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24045.
Well differentiated (WD) and dedifferentiated (DD) retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS) have distinct biologic behaviors. Consequently, the therapeutic approaches for these tumors differ and mandate an accurate preoperative diagnosis. The authors of this report evaluated whether computed tomography (CT) can be used to differentiate between WD and DD RPLS.
Imaging studies (CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography-CT) from 78 patients with RPLS who underwent surgery at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC) between 2001 and 2007 were reviewed by a senior bone and soft tissue sarcoma radiologist who was blinded to the final histopathologic diagnosis. A focal nodular/water density area within an RPLS was interpreted as a marker suggestive of DD. Correlations between imaging diagnosis, histology, and clinical outcome were analyzed.
The study radiologist identified 60 RPLS as DD and 17 RPLS as WD. A radiologic diagnosis of a WD was correlated with preoperative biopsy and postoperative histology in all patients (100%). Focal nodular/water density was a very sensitive marker of DD (97.8%); however, it had relatively low specificity (51.5%). Sixteen WD RPLS (48.5%) contained focal nodular/water density areas, leading to their misdiagnosis as DD; half of those tumors had hypercellular WD. Of 78 preoperative biopsies, 22 (28.2%) were performed at UTMDACC under CT guidance. Preoperative histologic diagnoses obtained from 12 biopsies derived from focal nodular/water density areas were confirmed as unchanged on final pathology; whereas, in 50% of biopsies that were not taken from a suspicious area, DD histology was misdiagnosed as WD.
When CT features are suggestive of WD, no further diagnostic tests are needed for tumor characterization. Moreover, CT can accurately identify most DD, thereby rendering their under-treatment unlikely; however, a CT-guided biopsy is needed to differentiate between DD and WD RPLS that contain focal nodular/water density areas, thereby avoiding their over treatment.
高分化(WD)和去分化(DD)腹膜后脂肪肉瘤(RPLS)具有不同的生物学行为。因此,针对这些肿瘤的治疗方法有所不同,需要准确的术前诊断。本报告的作者评估了计算机断层扫描(CT)是否可用于区分WD和DD RPLS。
回顾了2001年至2007年间在德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心(UTMDACC)接受手术的78例RPLS患者的影像学研究(CT、磁共振成像和正电子发射断层扫描-CT),由一位对最终组织病理学诊断不知情的资深骨与软组织肉瘤放射科医生进行评估。RPLS内的局灶性结节/水样密度区域被视为提示DD的标志物。分析了影像学诊断、组织学和临床结果之间的相关性。
研究放射科医生将60例RPLS诊断为DD,17例诊断为WD。WD的放射学诊断与所有患者的术前活检和术后组织学均相关(100%)。局灶性结节/水样密度是DD的一个非常敏感的标志物(97.8%);然而,其特异性相对较低(51.5%)。16例WD RPLS(48.5%)含有局灶性结节/水样密度区域,导致它们被误诊为DD;其中一半肿瘤为细胞增多型WD。78例术前活检中,22例(28.2%)在UTMDACC的CT引导下进行。从12例取自局灶性结节/水样密度区域的活检中获得的术前组织学诊断在最终病理检查中被确认为未改变;而在50%未取自可疑区域的活检中,DD组织学被误诊为WD。
当CT特征提示为WD时,无需进一步的诊断检查来明确肿瘤特征。此外,CT可以准确识别大多数DD,从而不太可能导致治疗不足;然而,对于含有局灶性结节/水样密度区域的DD和WD RPLS,需要进行CT引导下活检以进行区分,从而避免过度治疗。