Donahue James M, Nichols Francis C, Li Zhuo, Schomas David A, Allen Mark S, Cassivi Stephen D, Jatoi Aminah, Miller Robert C, Wigle Dennis A, Shen K Robert, Deschamps Claude
Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Feb;87(2):392-8; discussion 398-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.11.001.
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagogastrectomy has become the standard of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. This report analyzes our experience with this treatment approach.
From January 1998 through December 2003, all patients from a single institution receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagogastrectomy were reviewed for operative mortality, morbidity, long-term survival, and factors affecting survival. Only patients preoperatively staged with both computed tomographic scans and endoscopic ultrasound were included.
There were 162 patients (142 men, 20 women), and the median age was 61 years (range, 22 to 81 years). Histopathology was adenocarcinoma in 143 patients and squamous cell in 19. Pretreatment clinical stage was II in 28 patients (17%), III in 111 (68%), and IV (M1a) in 23 (14%). Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy was the most common procedure, occurring in 132 patients. Operative mortality and morbidity was 4.9% and 37%, respectively. Pathologic response was complete in 42 patients (26%), near complete in 27 (17%), partial in 88 (54%), and unresectable in 5 (3%). Five-year survival for overall, complete, near complete, and partial response patients was 34%, 55%, 27%, and 27%, respectively (p = 0.013). Patients whose lymph nodes were rendered free of cancer showed improved overall and disease-free survival compared with patients having persistently positive lymph nodes (p = 0.019).
Esophagogastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can be performed with low mortality and morbidity. Patients with complete pathologic response have significantly improved long-term survival compared with patients with near complete and partial responses. Future efforts should be directed at understanding determinants of complete responses.
新辅助放化疗后行食管胃切除术已成为局部晚期食管癌患者的标准治疗方案。本报告分析了我们采用这种治疗方法的经验。
回顾了1998年1月至2003年12月期间,来自单一机构接受新辅助放化疗后行食管胃切除术的所有患者的手术死亡率、发病率、长期生存率以及影响生存的因素。仅纳入术前通过计算机断层扫描和内镜超声进行分期的患者。
共有162例患者(142例男性,20例女性),中位年龄为61岁(范围22至81岁)。组织病理学检查显示,143例为腺癌,19例为鳞状细胞癌。治疗前临床分期为II期的患者有28例(17%),III期的有111例(68%),IV期(M1a)的有23例(14%)。Ivor Lewis食管胃切除术是最常见的手术方式,有132例患者采用。手术死亡率和发病率分别为4.9%和37%。病理反应完全缓解的患者有42例(26%),接近完全缓解的有27例(17%),部分缓解的有88例(54%),不可切除的有5例(3%)。总体、完全缓解、接近完全缓解和部分缓解患者的5年生存率分别为34%、55%、27%和27%(p = 0.013)。与淋巴结持续阳性的患者相比,淋巴结无癌转移的患者总体生存率和无病生存率有所提高(p = 0.019)。
新辅助放化疗后行食管胃切除术的死亡率和发病率较低。与接近完全缓解和部分缓解的患者相比,病理反应完全缓解的患者长期生存率显著提高。未来应致力于了解完全缓解的决定因素。