Alter David A, Oh Paul I, Chong Alice
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Feb;16(1):102-13. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328325d662.
The magnitude and mechanisms of survival benefit associated with cardiac rehabilitation services among real-world populations within a universal health care system remain unclear.
This retrospective matched cohort study compared the long-term survival of 2042 cardiac rehabilitation participants with 2042 matched controls after an index acute cardiac hospitalization between 1999 and 2003, in Ontario, Canada. Each patient survived at least 1 year without recurrent admissions after discharge from the index hospitalization, and was followed for a mean of 5.25 years. Additional matching criteria included the type of sentinel cardiac events, age, sex, socioeconomic status, geography, previous cardiac and noncardiac hospitalizations. A Cox proportional hazards model further adjusted for baseline cardiovascular risk factors and process factors, cardiovascular risk-factor progression, downstream coronary procedure and evidence-based pharmacotherapy utilization.
Cardiac rehabilitation participation was associated with a 50% lower mortality rate (2.6 vs. 5.1%, P<0.001) as compared with population-matched controls. Statistically significant mortality benefits were observed among high-risk patients, and there was no significant interaction among age, cardiac rehabilitation participation, and survival (P=0.22). Associated survival advantages were not meaningfully altered after adjustment for cardiovascular risk-factor progression or the downstream utilization rates of cardiac procedures and evidence-based cardiovascular therapies; survival benefits predominantly applied to those patients that were most compliant with the program.
Cardiac rehabilitation is associated with significant long-term survival advantages after index cardiovascular hospitalizations. Despite universal access to medical care, such survival advantages seem to be mediated by compliant behaviors more so than by ancillary health service or evidence-based pharmacotherapy utilization.
在全民医疗保健系统中,现实世界人群接受心脏康复服务所带来的生存获益程度及机制仍不明确。
这项回顾性匹配队列研究比较了1999年至2003年在加拿大安大略省因首次急性心脏住院后,2042名心脏康复参与者与2042名匹配对照者的长期生存情况。每位患者在首次住院出院后至少存活1年且无再次入院,并平均随访5.25年。其他匹配标准包括标志性心脏事件类型、年龄、性别、社会经济地位、地理位置、既往心脏和非心脏住院情况。Cox比例风险模型进一步调整了基线心血管危险因素和过程因素、心血管危险因素进展、下游冠状动脉手术及循证药物治疗的使用情况。
与人群匹配的对照者相比,参与心脏康复与死亡率降低50%相关(2.6%对5.1%,P<0.001)。在高危患者中观察到了具有统计学意义的生存获益,且年龄、心脏康复参与情况和生存之间无显著交互作用(P=0.22)。在调整心血管危险因素进展或心脏手术及循证心血管治疗的下游使用率后,相关的生存优势没有明显改变;生存获益主要适用于那些最遵守该计划的患者。
首次心血管住院后,心脏康复与显著的长期生存优势相关。尽管全民都能获得医疗服务,但这种生存优势似乎更多地是由依从行为介导,而非辅助医疗服务或循证药物治疗的使用。