Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Mar;73(3):560-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
To investigate the impact of right ventricle (RV) contrast attenuation on the accuracy of RV function analysis at cardiac CT performed for coronary imaging.
We analyzed multi-phase cardiac dual-source CT studies of 40 consecutive patients (mean age 60.9+/-12.3 years; 13 women) with normal valve function. Function analyses of both the right and left ventricle (RV and LV) were performed using dedicated post processing software and stroke volumes (SV) were computed for each ventricle. The accuracy of the RV-SV measurements was determined based upon comparison to LV-SV measurement. The level of contrast attenuation of the RV was recorded at three separate regions of interest-below the pulmonary valve, mid-ventricular, and inferior RV. The accuracy of RV function assessment was correlated with the level of attenuation using regression analyses.
There was a statistically significant correlation between the accuracy of RV function assessment and the level of RV attenuation in the inferior RV (adjusted R(2)=73.1%, p<0.0001). When compared to LV-SV measurements, in studies with low RV attenuation (<175 HUs, n=19) the mean deviation of RV-SV from LV-SV was 29.0+/-10.8 ml (42.1+/-13.9%). In studies with high RV attenuation (> or =175 HUs, n=21) the mean deviation of RV-SV from LV-SV was significantly lower 6.9+/-10.5 ml (9.9+/-16.0%).
The accuracy of RV function analysis is dependent on the level of contrast medium attenuation achieved in the inferior RV. There should be at least intermediate attenuation (>175 HUs) to enable accurate functional analysis. At low attenuation levels RV function parameters are prone to underestimation.
研究在用于冠状动脉成像的心脏 CT 中,右心室(RV)对比衰减对 RV 功能分析准确性的影响。
我们分析了 40 例连续患者(平均年龄 60.9+/-12.3 岁;13 名女性)的多期心脏双源 CT 研究,这些患者的瓣膜功能正常。使用专用的后处理软件对右心室和左心室(RV 和 LV)进行功能分析,并计算每个心室的每搏量(SV)。RV-SV 测量的准确性是基于与 LV-SV 测量的比较来确定的。在三个不同的感兴趣区域(肺动脉瓣下方、中室和下 RV)记录 RV 的对比衰减水平。使用回归分析将 RV 功能评估的准确性与衰减水平相关联。
RV 功能评估的准确性与下 RV 衰减水平之间存在统计学显著相关性(调整后的 R(2)=73.1%,p<0.0001)。与 LV-SV 测量值相比,在 RV 衰减较低(<175HU,n=19)的研究中,RV-SV 与 LV-SV 的平均偏差为 29.0+/-10.8ml(42.1+/-13.9%)。在 RV 衰减较高(≥175HU,n=21)的研究中,RV-SV 与 LV-SV 的平均偏差明显较低为 6.9+/-10.5ml(9.9+/-16.0%)。
RV 功能分析的准确性取决于下 RV 中实现的对比介质衰减水平。至少需要中等衰减(>175HU)才能实现准确的功能分析。在低衰减水平下,RV 功能参数容易被低估。