Munro Gordon
Department of Pharmacology, NeuroSearch A/S, Ballerup, Denmark.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2009 Mar 1;605(1-3):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Jan 11.
The formalin test is used as a primary behavioural screen for assaying the antinociceptive activity of compounds in laboratory rodents. After hindpaw formalin injection, nociceptive behaviours are expressed in a biphasic pattern and correlate closely with the concentration of formalin injected. Here, the antinociceptive efficacy of six compounds used in the clinical treatment of chronic pain was compared in rats injected with either 1% or 5% formalin. Predictably, the anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen (30-300 mg/kg) attenuated second phase (16-40 min) nociceptive behaviours in 5% formalin-injected rats; 1% formalin-injected rats were unaffected. The anti-epileptic drugs gabapentin (50-200 mg/kg) and lamotrigine (10-60 mg/kg) were antinociceptive only during second phase in both 1% and 5% tests. Notably, they were 2-4 times more potent in 1% vs 5% formalin-injected rats. The dual monoamine reuptake inhibitor duloxetine (3-60 mg/kg) consistently attenuated nociceptive behaviours during first phase and interphase in both tests. However second phase nociception was only attenuated in 5% formalin-injected rats giving rise to a 6 fold increase in potency compared with 1% formalin-injected rats. The micro-opioid receptor agonist morphine (1-6 mg/kg) and the combined micro-opioid receptor agonist/monoamine reuptake inhibitor tramadol (5-50 mg/kg) both attenuated nociceptive behaviours throughout the duration of both the 1% and 5% tests; no difference in antinociceptive potency occurred for either compound during second phase. Thus, for mechanistically-distinct compounds the predictive antinociceptive capacity of the formalin test can vary with the concentration of formalin injected, likely as a result of peripheral and central nociceptive signalling mechanisms being differentially engaged.
福尔马林试验被用作一种主要的行为筛选方法,用于测定实验室啮齿动物中化合物的抗伤害感受活性。在后爪注射福尔马林后,伤害感受行为呈现双相模式,并与注射的福尔马林浓度密切相关。在此,在注射1%或5%福尔马林的大鼠中比较了六种用于慢性疼痛临床治疗的化合物的抗伤害感受功效。不出所料,抗炎药布洛芬(30 - 300毫克/千克)减弱了注射5%福尔马林大鼠的第二阶段(16 - 40分钟)伤害感受行为;注射1%福尔马林的大鼠未受影响。抗癫痫药物加巴喷丁(50 - 200毫克/千克)和拉莫三嗪(10 - 60毫克/千克)仅在1%和5%试验的第二阶段具有抗伤害感受作用。值得注意的是,在注射1%福尔马林的大鼠中,它们的效力比注射5%福尔马林的大鼠高2 - 4倍。双重单胺再摄取抑制剂度洛西汀(3 - 60毫克/千克)在两项试验的第一阶段和中间阶段均持续减弱伤害感受行为。然而,仅在注射5%福尔马林的大鼠中第二阶段伤害感受被减弱,与注射1%福尔马林的大鼠相比,效力增加了6倍。微阿片受体激动剂吗啡(1 - 6毫克/千克)和微阿片受体激动剂/单胺再摄取抑制剂组合曲马多(5 - 50毫克/千克)在1%和5%试验的整个持续时间内均减弱了伤害感受行为;在第二阶段,两种化合物的抗伤害感受效力均无差异。因此,对于机制不同的化合物,福尔马林试验的预测抗伤害感受能力可能会因注射的福尔马林浓度而异,这可能是由于外周和中枢伤害感受信号传导机制被不同程度激活所致。