Marcos R, Santos M, Santos N, Malhão F, Ferreira F, Monteiro R A F, Rocha E
Cytology Diagnostic Services, Laboratory of Histology and Embryology, ICBAS - Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, UP, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Vet Clin Pathol. 2009 Mar;38(1):94-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2008.00098.x. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
Special stains to demonstrate microorganisms or intra- and extracellular substances have not been evaluated in detail regarding their applicability and usefulness in destained cytologic specimens.
The aim of this study is to compare the results of routine special stains on destained slides previously stained with Hemacolor and on fresh (unstained) specimens.
Archival Hemacolor-stained fine needle aspirate specimens of inflammation with infectious agents (bacterial, mycobacterial, and fungal infections), neoplasia (melanoma, myxosarcoma, and mammary adenocarcinoma), and hemorrhage (pericardial effusion) from 14 dogs and 7 cats were selected. Cells in a minimum of 4 fields were photographed and 5 slides from each case were then destained by different methods (alcohol acid or microwave). Seven special stains were applied selectively to the destained slides, depending on the cytologic findings: periodic acid Schiff, Grocott-Gomori methenamine silver, Gram's, Ziehl-Neelsen, Alcian blue, Fontana-Masson, and Prussian blue. The same fields were rephotographed and 2 observers evaluated the slides qualitatively, with comparison to fresh cytologic specimens from similar lesions.
Special stains applied to destained slides demonstrated the expected cellular and extracellular material or organisms independent of the destaining method. Staining intensity, nonspecific staining (background), cell morphology, and nuclear counterstaining results were similar to those of special stains applied to fresh unstained slides.
Destaining does not appear to affect the results of routine special staining for cytologic specimens. Destaining before special stains may be a valuable diagnostic strategy when few slides are present or only stained slides are available.
用于显示微生物或细胞内和细胞外物质的特殊染色在褪色的细胞学标本中的适用性和实用性尚未得到详细评估。
本研究的目的是比较常规特殊染色在先前用Hemacolor染色的褪色玻片和新鲜(未染色)标本上的结果。
选取14只犬和7只猫的存档Hemacolor染色细针穿刺抽吸标本,包括伴有感染因子(细菌、分枝杆菌和真菌感染)的炎症、肿瘤(黑色素瘤、黏液肉瘤和乳腺腺癌)以及出血(心包积液)。拍摄至少4个视野中的细胞,然后用不同方法(酒精酸或微波)对每个病例的5张玻片进行褪色处理。根据细胞学检查结果,有选择地对褪色玻片应用7种特殊染色:过碘酸希夫染色、Grocott-Gomori六胺银染色、革兰染色、齐-尼染色、阿尔辛蓝染色、丰塔纳-马松染色和普鲁士蓝染色。对相同视野重新拍照,2名观察者对玻片进行定性评估,并与来自类似病变的新鲜细胞学标本进行比较。
应用于褪色玻片的特殊染色显示出预期的细胞和细胞外物质或生物体,与褪色方法无关。染色强度、非特异性染色(背景)、细胞形态和核复染结果与应用于新鲜未染色玻片的特殊染色相似。
褪色似乎不影响细胞学标本常规特殊染色的结果。当玻片数量很少或只有染色玻片可用时,在特殊染色前进行褪色可能是一种有价值的诊断策略。