Barros Romina M, Silver Ellen J, Stein Ruth E K
Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore and Rose F. Kennedy Center, Bronx, New York, USA.
Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):431-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2825.
This study examines the amount of recess that children 8 to 9 years of age receive in the United States and compares the group classroom behavior of children receiving daily recess with that of children not receiving daily recess.
This is a secondary analysis of a public-use data set, the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-1999, third-grade data set. Children were categorized into 2 levels of recess exposure, that is, none/minimal break (<1 break of 15 minutes/day) or some recess. Some recess was further categorized into 5 levels on the basis of frequency and duration of recess. Child, parent, school, and classroom characteristics of those with and without recess were compared. The group classroom behavior was assessed by using the teacher's rating of class behavior.
Complete data were available for 10301 to 11624 children 8 to 9 years of age. There were equal numbers of boys and girls (boys: 50.3%). Children exposed to none/minimal break (30%) were much more likely to be black, to be from families with lower incomes and lower levels of education, to live in large cities, to be from the Northeast or South, and to attend public school, compared with those with recess. Teacher's rating of classroom behavior scores were better for children with some recess than for those with none/minimal break. This finding was maintained in multivariate regression analysis. However, among children receiving daily recess, the teacher's rating of class behavior scores did not differ significantly according to the level of exposure.
These results indicated that, among 8- to 9-year-old children, having > or =1 daily recess period of >15 minutes in length was associated with better teacher's rating of class behavior scores. This study suggests that schoolchildren in this age group should be provided with daily recess.
本研究调查了美国8至9岁儿童课间休息的时长,并比较了每日有课间休息的儿童与无课间休息的儿童在课堂上的群体行为表现。
这是一项对公开数据集“1998 - 1999年幼儿园班级儿童纵向研究”三年级数据集的二次分析。儿童被分为2种课间休息情况,即无/极少休息(每天休息少于1次,每次15分钟)或有课间休息。有课间休息的情况又根据休息的频率和时长进一步分为5个等级。比较了有课间休息和无课间休息儿童的儿童、家长、学校和课堂特征。课堂群体行为通过教师对课堂行为的评分来评估。
共有10301至11624名8至9岁儿童的完整数据。男女生人数相等(男生占50.3%)。与有课间休息的儿童相比,无/极少休息的儿童(占30%)更有可能是黑人,来自收入较低、教育水平较低的家庭,居住在大城市,来自东北部或南部,且就读于公立学校。有课间休息的儿童的教师课堂行为评分高于无/极少休息的儿童。这一发现在多变量回归分析中依然成立。然而,在每日有课间休息的儿童中,教师对课堂行为的评分在不同休息程度之间没有显著差异。
这些结果表明,在8至9岁的儿童中,每天有≥1次、每次时长>15分钟的课间休息与教师更高的课堂行为评分相关。本研究表明,这个年龄段的学童应该每天都有课间休息。