[麻醉科高年资住院医师使用气道镜与麦氏喉镜进行气管插管操作的性能比较]
[Comparison of performance of endotracheal intubation by senior residents in anesthesiology using Airway Scope VS Macintosh laryngoscope].
作者信息
Hakozaki Takahiro, Hirabayashi Yoshihiro, Seo Norimasa
机构信息
Department of Anesthesia, Fukushima Prefectural Minami-Aizu Hospital, Fukushima 967-0006.
出版信息
Masui. 2009 Jan;58(1):100-2.
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the performance of the Airway Scope, we studied the time to complete endotracheal intubation performed by senior residents in anesthesiology.
METHODS
The trachea of the patient was intubated using the Airway Scope (n = 90) or the Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 81).
RESULTS
The time to complete endotracheal intubation was 42 +/- 23 sec with the Airway Scope and 41 +/- 20 sec with the Macintosh laryngoscope.
CONCLUSIONS
The Airway Scope performed as well as the Macintosh laryngoscope when used by senior residents in anesthesiology on patients with normal airway.
背景
为评估气道镜的性能，我们研究了麻醉科高年资住院医师完成气管插管的时间。
方法
使用气道镜（n = 90）或麦金托什喉镜（n = 81）对患者进行气管插管。
结果
使用气道镜完成气管插管的时间为42±23秒，使用麦金托什喉镜为41±20秒。
结论
在气道正常的患者中，麻醉科高年资住院医师使用气道镜时的表现与使用麦金托什喉镜时相当。
Zotero 插件