Yonekawa Yasuhiro
University of Zürich.
No Shinkei Geka. 2009 Jan;37(1):71-90.
The author reports his experience of 410 surgeries of meningiomas on 365 cases during the last 13.5 years, including 51 surgeries on recurrent meningiomas and 8 surgeries with the change of initial approach on the same meningiomas. In the surgical management of meningiomas, following comments are to be emphasized: Appropriate approach and interruption of blood supply are of cardinal importance in surgical management of meningiomas. For the latter purpose, preoperative embolization of feeding arteries is recommended especially in deep seated and large meningiomas more than 3 cm in diameter for carrying out their surgical extirpation fast and radically. Olfactory groove meningiomas, planum sphenoidal meningiomas, tuberculum sellae meningiomas and sphenoid ridge meningiomas are managed with pterional approach. The latter two meningiomas may necessitate selective extradural anterior clinoidectomy SEAC. For the management of large midline meningiomas, combination with interhemispheric approach is necessary to manage pial supply appropriately for the preservation of circulation of the anterior cerebral artery ACA. Extension of the former two meningiomas to the other side can be managed with falcal incision and/or drilling out of the crista galli without performing a bifrontal approach. Reduction of exophthalmos due to sphenoid ridge meningiomas infiltrating Periorbita and extraocular muscles is hardly to be expected even after subtotal removal and extensive decompression of the orbita at the superior and lateral walls in combination with SEAC. Accidental compromise of the lenticulostriate arteries arising from M1 portion embraced by tumor nodules should be managed with oxycellulose and fibrin glue at first without their bipolar coagulation, as resulting infarction in the territory causes persistent hemiparesis. Meningiomas in the cavernous sinus should be observed as long as possible in case of no growth, as they remain the same in their size and extension mostly for a long time. In case of growth, stereotactic radiosurgery is the first choice and at last would come surgical intervention at the cost of quality of life QOL. Appropriate approaches for meningiomas arising from the incisura tentorii would be either the amygdalohippocampectomy AHE approach namely transSylvian transsulcus circularis approach for their anterior localization or the supracerebellar transtentorial SCTT approach for the posterior localization in the sitting position. In the latter following structures are to be preserved with great care: A. parietooccipitalis, trochlear nerve, Vena Rosenthal and the superior cerebellar artery which could have considerable supply to the tumor. Meningiomas of the falcotentorial junction are managed also with this approach but may necessitate combination of the suboccipital transtentorial approach large upper clivus meningiomas can be removed more effectively by paramedian or lateral suboccipital craniotomy via SCTT approach in the sitting position rather than the subtemporal transpetrosal approach. Clean and wider operative fields in the former approach are emphasized. Special mention is made to transvertebralis (dural) ring approach TVRA for the foramen magnum or lower clivus meningiomas, in which the vertebral artery can be mobilized without performing more extensive far lateral approach. Difficulties of management of recurrent parasagittal meningiomas with the location corresponding to the gyrus paracentralis plus supplementary motor area are to be emphasized. Role of the venous sinus reconstruction is discussed. Difficulties of management of recurrent meningiomas represented by atypical or anaplastic meningiomas WHO grade II or III which can not be managed only by surgical removal is discussed by presenting some example cases. Biological activity of meningiomas in different location can be quite different in multiple recurrent meningiomas. Meningiomas intractable to irradiation and/or chemotherapy are another challenging topic, being beyond the scope of this paper.
作者报告了过去13.5年中对365例患者进行的410例脑膜瘤手术的经验,其中包括51例复发性脑膜瘤手术以及8例对同一脑膜瘤改变初始手术入路的手术。在脑膜瘤的手术治疗中,应强调以下几点:合适的手术入路和阻断血供在脑膜瘤手术治疗中至关重要。对于后者,建议对供血动脉进行术前栓塞,尤其是对于直径超过3cm的深部和大型脑膜瘤,以便快速、彻底地进行手术切除。嗅沟脑膜瘤、蝶骨平台脑膜瘤、鞍结节脑膜瘤和蝶骨嵴脑膜瘤采用翼点入路治疗。后两种脑膜瘤可能需要选择性硬膜外前床突切除术(SEAC)。对于大型中线脑膜瘤的治疗,需要结合纵裂入路,以妥善处理软膜供血,从而保留大脑前动脉(ACA)的循环。前两种脑膜瘤向对侧扩展时,可通过切开大脑镰和/或磨除鸡冠来处理,而无需采用双额入路。即使在进行次全切除并对上壁和外侧壁眼眶进行广泛减压以及联合SEAC后,因蝶骨嵴脑膜瘤侵犯眶周和眼外肌导致的眼球突出也很难减轻。对于被肿瘤结节包绕的M1段发出的豆纹动脉意外受损,应首先使用氧化纤维素和纤维蛋白胶处理,而不进行双极电凝,因为该区域梗死会导致持续性偏瘫。海绵窦内的脑膜瘤如果没有生长,应尽可能长时间观察,因为它们大多在很长一段时间内大小和范围保持不变。如果生长,立体定向放射外科是首选,最后才是牺牲生活质量(QOL)进行手术干预。对于起源于小脑幕切迹的脑膜瘤,合适的手术入路要么是杏仁核 - 海马切除术(AHE)入路,即经侧裂经环沟入路用于其前部定位,要么是小脑上幕下入路(SCTT)用于后部定位,采用坐位。对于后者,以下结构需要特别小心保留:A. 顶枕叶、滑车神经、Rosenthal静脉和对肿瘤可能有大量供血的小脑上动脉。小脑幕切迹脑膜瘤也采用此方法治疗,但可能需要联合枕下幕下入路。大型上斜坡脑膜瘤通过坐位的SCTT入路经枕下旁正中或外侧开颅术比经颞下经岩骨入路能更有效地切除。强调前一种入路有更清洁、更宽敞的手术视野。特别提到经椎骨(硬膜)环入路(TVRA)用于枕大孔或下斜坡脑膜瘤,在此入路中可在不进行更广泛的远外侧入路的情况下游离椎动脉。应强调处理位于中央旁回加辅助运动区对应位置的复发性矢状窦旁脑膜瘤的困难。讨论了静脉窦重建的作用。通过一些病例介绍,讨论了以非典型或间变性脑膜瘤(WHO二级或三级)为代表的复发性脑膜瘤的治疗困难,这些脑膜瘤不能仅通过手术切除来处理。在多次复发性脑膜瘤中,不同位置的脑膜瘤的生物学活性可能有很大差异。对放疗和/或化疗难治的脑膜瘤是另一个具有挑战性的话题,本文不涉及。