Suppr超能文献

在一项针对活动性类风湿关节炎患者的双盲、甲氨蝶呤对照研究中,评估p38丝裂原活化蛋白激酶抑制剂帕马吡莫德的疗效和安全性。

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of pamapimod, a p38 MAP kinase inhibitor, in a double-blind, methotrexate-controlled study of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Cohen Stanley B, Cheng Tien-Tsai, Chindalore Vishala, Damjanov Nemanja, Burgos-Vargas Ruben, Delora Patricia, Zimany Kathleen, Travers Helen, Caulfield John P

机构信息

Metroplex Clinical Research, Dallas, Texas 75235, USA.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Feb;60(2):335-44. doi: 10.1002/art.24266.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of pamapimod (a selective inhibitor of the alpha-isoform of p38 MAP kinase) as monotherapy in comparison with methotrexate (MTX) treatment in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups and received 12 weeks of double-blind treatment. One group received MTX (7.5 mg/week with planned escalation to 20 mg/week), and 3 groups received pamapimod (50, 150, or 300 mg) once daily. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (achieving an ACR20 response) at 12 weeks. Secondary end points included ACR50 and ACR70 responses, change from baseline in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), categorical analyses of DAS28/European League Against Rheumatism response, and change from baseline in each parameter of the ACR core set of measures. Safety monitoring included recording of adverse events (AEs), laboratory testing, immunology assessments, administration of electrocardiograms, and assessment of vital signs.

RESULTS

Patients assigned to receive MTX and pamapimod had similar demographics and baseline characteristics. At week 12, fewer patients taking pamapimod had an ACR20 response (23%, 18%, and 31% in the 50-, 150-, and 300-mg groups, respectively) compared with patients taking MTX (45%). Secondary efficacy end points showed a similar pattern. AEs were typically characterized as mild and included infections, skin disorders, and dizziness. Pamapimod was generally well tolerated, but the 300-mg dose appeared to be more toxic than either the 2 lower doses or MTX.

CONCLUSION

The present results showed that pamapimod was not as effective as MTX in the treatment of active RA.

摘要

目的

确定帕马匹莫德(一种p38丝裂原活化蛋白激酶α亚型的选择性抑制剂)作为单一疗法与甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗成年活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

患者被随机分配到4个治疗组中的1组,接受12周的双盲治疗。一组接受MTX(7.5mg/周,计划逐步增加至20mg/周),3组每天接受一次帕马匹莫德(50、150或300mg)。主要疗效终点是在12周时达到美国风湿病学会20%改善标准(实现ACR20反应)的患者比例。次要终点包括ACR50和ACR70反应、28个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28)相对于基线的变化、DAS28/欧洲抗风湿病联盟反应的分类分析以及ACR核心指标组各参数相对于基线的变化。安全性监测包括不良事件(AE)记录、实验室检查、免疫学评估、心电图检查和生命体征评估。

结果

分配接受MTX和帕马匹莫德治疗的患者在人口统计学和基线特征方面相似。在第12周时,与接受MTX治疗的患者(45%)相比,接受帕马匹莫德治疗的患者达到ACR20反应的比例较低(50mg组、150mg组和300mg组分别为23%、18%和31%)。次要疗效终点显示出类似的模式。AE通常表现为轻度,包括感染、皮肤疾病和头晕。帕马匹莫德总体耐受性良好,但300mg剂量似乎比两种较低剂量或MTX毒性更大。

结论

目前的结果表明,帕马匹莫德在治疗活动性RA方面不如MTX有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验