Sharp F R, Ryan A F
Department of Neurosciences University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine (M-024), La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
J Comp Neurol. 1984 Apr 1;224(2):286-306. doi: 10.1002/cne.902240208.
Electrical stimulation of the right forelimb motor (MI) sensory (SI) cortex in normal, adult rats produced repetitive left forelimb movements. Regions of increased (14C) 2-deoxyglucose (2DG) uptake were mapped auto-radiographically during these movements. MI stimulation activated the ipsilateral reticular tegmental pontine nucleus (RTP) and the middle (rostral-caudal) third of the pontine nuclei including pyramidal (P), medial (POM), ventral (POV), and lateral (POL) pontine nuclei. The ipsilateral inferior olivary complex was activated including dorsal accessory olive (DAO), principal olive (PO), and medial accessory olive (MAO). The contralateral lateral reticular (LR) nucleus and nucleus cuneatus (CU) were activated. Lateral vermal, paravermal, and hemispheric portions of the contralateral cerebellum were also activated. Parts of vermian lobules IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII, and lobulus simplex, crus I, crus II, paramedian lobule, and copula pyramidis were activated. Granule cell layers were activated much more than molecular layers. Discrete microzones of high granule cell 2DG uptake alternated with zones of low uptake in left paramedian lobule and copula pyramidis and may correlate with the fractured cerebellar somatotopy described physiologically by Welker and his associates. Portions of the left lateral and interpositus nuclei were metabolically activated. Medial portions of laminae I-VI were activated in the dorsal horn of cervical spinal cord. The 2DG uptake was either unchanged or decreased in the ventral horn. Thoracic and lumbar spinal cord were not activated. Monsynaptic MI and SI connections to P, POM, POV, POL, RTP, DAO, PO, MAO, LR, CU, and spinal cord could account for activation of those structures. However, there are no direct MI or SI connections to the deep cerebellar nuclei, the cerebellar hemisphere, or the muscles. Activation of these structures must be due to activation of polysynaptic pathways, sensory feedback from the moving forelimb, or both. The present experiments cannot distinguish these possibilities. Comparison of the regions activated during forelimb MI stimulation (FLMIS) to those activated during vibrissae MI stimulation (VMIS) suggests that the pontine nuclei, cerebellar hemisphere, and possibly the deep cerebellar nuclei are somatotopically organized. RTP, LR, CU, and spinal cord were activated during FLMIS but were not activated during VMIS. The failure to activate the ventral horn of cervical spinal cord may be due to known inhibition of alpha-motor neurons during motor cortex stimulation.
在正常成年大鼠中,对右侧前肢运动(MI)感觉(SI)皮层进行电刺激会引发左侧前肢的重复性运动。在这些运动过程中,通过放射自显影法绘制了(14C)2-脱氧葡萄糖(2DG)摄取增加的区域。MI刺激激活了同侧的脑桥被盖网状核(RTP)以及脑桥核的中间(头端-尾端)三分之一区域,包括锥体(P)、内侧(POM)、腹侧(POV)和外侧(POL)脑桥核。同侧的下橄榄复合体被激活,包括背侧副橄榄核(DAO)、主橄榄核(PO)和内侧副橄榄核(MAO)。对侧的外侧网状(LR)核和楔束核(CU)被激活。对侧小脑的蚓部外侧、旁蚓部和半球部分也被激活。蚓叶的IV、V、VI、VII和VIII小叶以及单小叶、小脑脚I、小脑脚II、旁正中小叶和锥体连合被激活。颗粒细胞层的激活程度远高于分子层。在左旁正中小叶和锥体连合中,高颗粒细胞2DG摄取的离散微区与低摄取区交替出现,这可能与Welker及其同事生理学上描述的破碎小脑躯体定位有关。左侧外侧核和间位核的部分区域代谢激活。颈髓背角的I-VI层内侧部分被激活。腹角的2DG摄取要么未改变,要么减少。胸髓和腰髓未被激活。MI和SI与P、POM、POV、POL、RTP、DAO、PO、MAO、LR、CU和脊髓的单突触连接可以解释这些结构的激活。然而,MI或SI与小脑深部核团、小脑半球或肌肉没有直接连接。这些结构的激活必定是由于多突触通路的激活、运动前肢的感觉反馈,或者两者兼而有之。目前的实验无法区分这些可能性。将前肢MI刺激(FLMIS)期间激活的区域与触须MI刺激(VMIS)期间激活的区域进行比较表明,脑桥核、小脑半球以及可能的小脑深部核团是按躯体定位组织的。RTP、LR、CU和脊髓在FLMIS期间被激活,但在VMIS期间未被激活。颈髓腹角未被激活可能是由于运动皮层刺激期间已知的α运动神经元抑制作用。