Pujol Nicolas, Beaufils Philippe
Orthopaedic Department, Hopital Andre Mignot, 177, rue de Versailles, 78157 Le Chesnay, France.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Apr;17(4):396-401. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0711-y. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
The presence of peripheral meniscal tears is common at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Techniques to preserve the maximum amount of meniscal tissue include "non operative" management (tear left alone, without repair or removal), meniscus repair, partial meniscectomy. There is a lack of consensus guidelines about the management of peripheral stable meniscal tears. When to remove, let alone or repair? We performed an evidence-based review of the outcomes of stable meniscal tears left in situ during ACL surgery, in order to assess the effectiveness of this popular procedure. Clinical and anatomical results (arthrography or second look arthroscopy) were analyzed. Our literature search yielded ten relevant studies (9 level IV, 1 level III). The mean time of follow-up was 16 months. Pain or mechanical symptoms related to the medial tibiofemoral joint were reported in 0-66% of cases. Subsequent medial meniscectomy or repair were performed in 0-33% of cases. Pain or mechanical symptoms related to the lateral tibiofemoral joint were reported in 0-18% cases. Subsequent lateral meniscectomy or repair were performed in 0-22% cases. A complete healing occurred in 50-61% cases for the medial meniscus and in 55-74% cases for the lateral meniscus. No definite conclusion can be made with regard to these results. The conservative approach is more effective for lateral menisci. The rate of bad results for the medial meniscus remains high when a conservative treatment is used. For the medial meniscus, repair of stable peripheral tears may be always indicated to decrease the risk of postoperative pain or subsequent meniscectomy.
前交叉韧带(ACL)重建时,半月板外周撕裂很常见。保留最大量半月板组织的技术包括“非手术”处理(撕裂处不做处理,不修复或切除)、半月板修复、部分半月板切除术。对于外周稳定型半月板撕裂的处理,目前缺乏共识性指南。何时切除、任其发展还是进行修复?我们对ACL手术中稳定型半月板撕裂留在原位的结果进行了循证综述,以评估这种常用手术的有效性。分析了临床和解剖学结果(关节造影或二次关节镜检查)。我们的文献检索得到了10项相关研究(9项IV级,1项III级)。平均随访时间为16个月。0 - 66%的病例报告了与内侧胫股关节相关的疼痛或机械症状。0 - 33%的病例随后进行了内侧半月板切除术或修复。0 - 18%的病例报告了与外侧胫股关节相关的疼痛或机械症状。0 - 22%的病例随后进行了外侧半月板切除术或修复。内侧半月板50 - 61%的病例实现了完全愈合,外侧半月板55 - 74%的病例实现了完全愈合。关于这些结果无法得出明确结论。保守方法对外侧半月板更有效。采用保守治疗时,内侧半月板的不良结果发生率仍然很高。对于内侧半月板,稳定的外周撕裂可能总是需要进行修复,以降低术后疼痛或后续半月板切除术的风险。