Chandani Sushil, Loechler Edward L
Biology Department, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
J Mol Graph Model. 2009 Apr;27(7):759-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2008.11.003. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
Chemicals and radiation can damage DNA leading to the formation of adducts/lesions, which - if not removed by DNA repair pathways - usually block replicative DNA polymerases (DNAPs). To overcome such potentially lethal blockage, cells have lesion bypass DNAPs, which are often in the Y-Family and include several classes. One class includes human DNAP kappa and E. coli DNAP IV, and they insert dCTP in the non-mutagenic pathway opposite [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG, which is the major adduct formed by the environmental carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene. Another class includes hDNAP eta and ecDNAP V, and they insert dATP opposite [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG in the dominant G-->T mutagenic pathway. Herein we develop a hypothesis for why the IV/kappa-class preferentially does cellular dCTP insertion. On the minor groove side of the active site, Y-Family DNAPs have a cleft/hole that can be analyzed based on an analogy to a "chimney." Our models of DNAP IV show a large chimney opening from which the pyrene of [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG can protrude, which allows canonical adduct-dG:dCTP pairing. In contrast, our models of DNAP V have small chimney openings that forces adduct-dG downward in the active site such that canonical adduct-dG:dCTP pairing is not possible. Based on X-ray structures, sequence alignment and our modeled structures of Y-Family DNAPs, chimney opening size seems primarily controlled by one amino acid ("flue-handle"), which dictates whether nearby amino acids ("flue") plug the chimney or not. Based on this analysis, a correlation is apparent: the flue is closed in V/eta-class DNAPs giving small chimney openings, while the flue is open for the IV/kappa-class giving large chimney openings. Secondarily, a hypothesis is developed for why the V/eta-class might preferentially do cellular dATP insertion opposite [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG: the small chimney forces adduct-dG lower in the active site, possibly leading to catalysis using a non-canonical dNTP shape that permits syn-adenine:adduct-dG base pairing. In summary, a hypothesize is developed that the pyrene moiety of [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG protrudes from the large chimney opening of DNAP IV, thus permitting canonical dCTP:adduct-dG pairing, while the small chimney opening of DNAP V forces [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG lower down in the active site, in which syn-adenine can pair with adduct-dG via a non-canonical dNTP shape.
化学物质和辐射会损伤DNA,导致加合物/损伤的形成。如果这些加合物/损伤未被DNA修复途径清除,通常会阻断复制性DNA聚合酶(DNAPs)。为了克服这种潜在的致命阻断,细胞具有损伤旁路DNAPs,它们通常属于Y家族,包括几个类别。一类包括人类DNAP κ和大肠杆菌DNAP IV,它们在非诱变途径中,在与[+ta]-苯并[a]芘-N(2)-dG相对的位置插入dCTP,[+ta]-苯并[a]芘-N(2)-dG是环境致癌物苯并[a]芘形成的主要加合物。另一类包括hDNAP η和ecDNAP V,它们在占主导地位的G→T诱变途径中,在与[+ta]-苯并[a]芘-N(2)-dG相对的位置插入dATP。在此,我们提出一个假说,解释为什么IV/κ类DNAPs优先进行细胞dCTP插入。在活性位点的小沟一侧,Y家族DNAPs有一个裂缝/空洞,可以通过类比“烟囱”来分析。我们的DNAP IV模型显示有一个大的烟囱开口,[+ta]-苯并[a]芘-N(2)-dG的芘可以从中突出,这允许加合物-dG与dCTP进行规范配对。相比之下,我们的DNAP V模型有小的烟囱开口,这会迫使加合物-dG在活性位点向下,使得加合物-dG与dCTP进行规范配对变得不可能。基于X射线结构、序列比对以及我们构建的Y家族DNAPs模型,烟囱开口大小似乎主要由一个氨基酸(“烟道把手”)控制,它决定了附近的氨基酸(“烟道”)是否堵塞烟囱。基于此分析,一种相关性很明显:在V/η类DNAPs中烟道是关闭的,导致烟囱开口小,而在IV/κ类DNAPs中烟道是打开的,导致烟囱开口大。其次,我们提出一个假说,解释为什么V/η类可能优先在与[+ta]-苯并[a]芘-N(2)-dG相对的位置进行细胞dATP插入:小烟囱迫使加合物-dG在活性位点更低的位置,可能导致使用一种非规范的dNTP形状进行催化,这种形状允许顺式腺嘌呤与加合物-dG碱基配对。总之,我们提出一个假说,即[+ta]-苯并[a]芘-N(2)-dG的芘部分从DNAP IV的大烟囱开口中突出,从而允许规范的dCTP与加合物-dG配对,而DNAP V的小烟囱开口迫使[+ta]-苯并[a]芘-N(2)-dG在活性位点更低的位置,在这个位置顺式腺嘌呤可以通过非规范的dNTP形状与加合物-dG配对。