Suppr超能文献

重复内镜超声引导下细针穿刺在既往细胞学检查结果不确定及阴性的小实性胰腺肿块中的作用

Role of repeated endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in small solid pancreatic masses with previous indeterminate and negative cytological findings.

作者信息

Tadic M, Kujundzic M, Stoos-Veic T, Kaic G, Vukelic-Markovic M

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Dig Dis. 2008;26(4):377-82. doi: 10.1159/000177025. Epub 2009 Jan 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite advances in imaging techniques, the differentiation between pancreatic cancer and benign lesions remains difficult. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an effective method for providing tissue diagnosis, but problems occur when lesions are small or the cytological diagnosis is indeterminate.

AIM

To prospectively evaluate the utility of EUS-FNA in patients with small solid pancreatic lesions and those with initial indeterminate or negative cytological diagnosis.

METHODS

During the study period we performed a total of 119 EUS-FNA procedures on 46 patients (mean age 56.3 years) for 47 small solid pancreatic lesions (range 7-30 mm, mean 17.2 mm in diameter). FNAs were performed in the presence of a cytopathologist. If cytological diagnoses were indeterminate, EUS-FNA was repeated within 3 weeks. Diagnoses were confirmed histologically or by follow-up (clinical and imaging: EUS +/- FNA and CT).

RESULTS

Localization of the lesions: head 28 (60%), uncinate process 4 (9%), body 11 (23%) and tail 4 (9%). On average, 3.7 passes were performed. We observed no complications. Initial cytological findings were: malignant 17 (36%), benign 21 (45%), and indeterminate 9 (19%). 8 (78%) of the indeterminate findings were confirmed to be malignant on repeated procedures. A diagnosis of pancreatic cancer was subsequently confirmed in 1 patient who had a benign cytological finding. 19 patients underwent surgery. Histology confirmed a neoplasm in all cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were 68, 100, 100, 73 and 83%, respectively. After repeated EUS-FNAs of indeterminate findings sensitivity, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy rose to 92, 77 and 96%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

EUS-FNA is a highly effective method for providing tissue diagnosis in patients with small solid pancreatic masses. Repeated procedures enhanced diagnostic accuracy in indeterminate findings, among which was high percentage of malignancies. EUS-FNA reduced the number of operations in patients with pancreatic solid masses.

摘要

引言

尽管成像技术有所进步,但胰腺癌与良性病变的鉴别仍很困难。内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术(EUS-FNA)是提供组织诊断的有效方法,但当病变较小或细胞学诊断不明确时会出现问题。

目的

前瞻性评估EUS-FNA在小的实性胰腺病变患者以及初始细胞学诊断不明确或为阴性的患者中的应用价值。

方法

在研究期间,我们对46例患者(平均年龄56.3岁)的47个小的实性胰腺病变(范围7-30毫米,平均直径17.2毫米)共进行了119次EUS-FNA操作。FNA操作在细胞病理学家在场的情况下进行。如果细胞学诊断不明确,则在3周内重复进行EUS-FNA。诊断通过组织学或随访(临床和影像学:EUS +/- FNA和CT)得以证实。

结果

病变的定位:胰头28个(60%),钩突4个(9%),胰体11个(23%),胰尾4个(9%)。平均进行了3.7针穿刺。我们未观察到并发症。初始细胞学检查结果为:恶性17个(36%),良性21个(45%),不明确9个(19%)。在重复操作中,8个(78%)不明确的结果被证实为恶性。1例细胞学检查结果为良性的患者随后被确诊为胰腺癌。19例患者接受了手术。组织学在所有病例中均证实为肿瘤。敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和诊断准确性分别为68%、100%、100%、73%和83%。在对不明确的结果重复进行EUS-FNA后,敏感性、阴性预测值和诊断准确性分别升至92%、77%和96%。

结论

EUS-FNA是为小的实性胰腺肿块患者提供组织诊断的高效方法。重复操作提高了不明确结果的诊断准确性,其中恶性肿瘤的比例较高。EUS-FNA减少了胰腺实性肿块患者的手术数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验