Drakos Stavros G, Kanakakis John V, Nanas Serafim, Bonios Michael, Kaldara Elisabeth, Katsaros Fotios, Pantsios Christos, Nanas John N
3rd Cardiology Department, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2009 Feb;53(2):157-61. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31819846cd.
Concern has been raised regarding the mortality and ethics related to the treatment of patients with end-stage chronic heart failure with chronic intermittent intravenous inotropic agents. We examined whether intermittent inotropic agents combined with oral amiodarone to prevent the proarrhythmic effect of inotropic agents results in better outcomes.
The study included 162 patients with decompensated end-stage chronic heart failure, who could be weaned from an initial 72-hour infusion of intravenous inotropes. Group 1 included 140 patients, who entered a 6-month program of weekly intermittent intravenous inotropic agents plus oral amiodarone, 200 mg twice a day. Group 2 included 22 patients, who were treated with optimal conventional therapy and were hospitalized for administration of intravenous medications as needed.
The baseline characteristics of groups 1 versus 2, including New York Heart Association functional class (IV in both groups), admission systolic arterial blood pressure (99 +/- 14 vs. 97 +/- 13 mm Hg), right atrial pressure (13 +/- 6 vs. 14 +/- 6 mm Hg), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (28 +/- 7 vs. 31 +/- 10 mm Hg), serum sodium (136 +/- 7 vs. 139 +/- 6 mEq/L) and serum creatinine (1.7 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.8 +/- 1.8 mg/dL), were similar. The 6-month (51% vs. 18%) and 1-year (36% vs. 9%) survival rates were significantly higher (P = 0.001 for both) in group 1 than in group 2. In addition, patients treated with intermittent intravenous inotropic agents improved their functional and hemodynamic status.
Intermittent intravenous inotropic agents combined with prophylactic oral amiodarone seem to improve the outcomes of patients with end-stage chronic heart failure. Further research is warranted to elucidate whether this treatment strategy should be considered as a standard therapy in patients with refractory end-stage heart failure.
对于使用慢性间歇性静脉注射正性肌力药物治疗终末期慢性心力衰竭患者的死亡率及伦理学问题,人们已提出担忧。我们研究了间歇性正性肌力药物联合口服胺碘酮以预防正性肌力药物的促心律失常作用是否能带来更好的结果。
该研究纳入了162例失代偿性终末期慢性心力衰竭患者,这些患者在最初72小时静脉注射正性肌力药物治疗后可以撤机。第1组包括140例患者,他们进入了一个为期6个月的项目,接受每周一次的间歇性静脉注射正性肌力药物加口服胺碘酮治疗,口服胺碘酮剂量为每日两次,每次200毫克。第2组包括22例患者,他们接受了最佳的常规治疗,并根据需要住院接受静脉用药。
第1组与第2组的基线特征相似,包括纽约心脏协会心功能分级(两组均为IV级)、入院时收缩动脉压(99±14与97±13毫米汞柱)、右心房压(13±6与14±6毫米汞柱)、肺毛细血管楔压(28±7与31±10毫米汞柱)、血清钠(136±7与139±6毫当量/升)以及血清肌酐(1.7±0.8与1.8±1.8毫克/分升)。第1组的6个月(51%对18%)和1年(36%对9%)生存率显著高于第2组(两者P值均为0.001)。此外,接受间歇性静脉注射正性肌力药物治疗的患者其功能和血流动力学状态得到改善。
间歇性静脉注射正性肌力药物联合预防性口服胺碘酮似乎能改善终末期慢性心力衰竭患者的预后。有必要进行进一步研究以阐明这种治疗策略是否应被视为难治性终末期心力衰竭患者的标准治疗方法。