Mangold Sabine, Schuster Corina, Keller Thierry, Zimmermann-Schlatter Andrea, Ettlin Thierry
Balgrist University Hospital, Spinal Cord Center, Zurich, Switzerland.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Feb;23(2):184-90. doi: 10.1177/1545968308324548.
Functional electrical stimulation (FES) allows active exercises in stroke patients with upper extremity paralysis.
To investigate the effect of motor training with FES on motor recovery in acute and subacute stroke patients with severe to complete arm and/or hand paralysis.
For this pilot study, 23 acute and subacute stroke patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 12) and control group (n = 11). Distributed over 4 weeks, FES training replaced 12 conventional training sessions in the intervention group. An Extended Barthel Index (EBI) subscore assessed the performance of activities of daily living (ADL). The Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment (CMSA) measured hand and arm function and shoulder pain. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) assessed resistance to passive movement. Unblinded assessments were performed prior to and following the end of the training period.
The EBI subscore and CMSA arm score improved significantly in both groups. The CMSA hand function improved significantly in the FES group. Resistance to passive movement of finger and wrist flexors increased significantly in the FES group. Shoulder pain did not change significantly. None of the outcome measures, however, demonstrated significant gain differences between the groups.
We did not find clear evidence for superiority or inferiority of FES. Our findings, and those of similar trials, suggest that the number of sessions should be at least doubled to test for superiority of FES in these highly impaired patients and approximately 50 participants would have to be assigned to each therapeutic intervention to find significant differences.
功能性电刺激(FES)可使上肢瘫痪的中风患者进行主动运动。
探讨FES运动训练对重度至完全性手臂和/或手部瘫痪的急性和亚急性中风患者运动恢复的影响。
在这项初步研究中,23例急性和亚急性中风患者被随机分配到干预组(n = 12)和对照组(n = 11)。在4周的时间里,干预组的FES训练取代了12次传统训练课程。扩展巴氏指数(EBI)子评分评估日常生活活动(ADL)的表现。Chedoke McMaster中风评估(CMSA)测量手和手臂功能以及肩部疼痛。改良Ashworth量表(MAS)评估被动运动的阻力。在训练期结束前后进行非盲法评估。
两组的EBI子评分和CMSA手臂评分均显著改善。FES组的CMSA手功能显著改善。FES组手指和腕部屈肌的被动运动阻力显著增加。肩部疼痛没有明显变化。然而,两组之间的任何结果指标均未显示出显著的差异。
我们没有发现FES优劣的明确证据。我们的研究结果以及类似试验的结果表明,训练次数应至少增加一倍,以测试FES在这些严重受损患者中的优势,并且每种治疗干预大约需要分配50名参与者才能发现显著差异。