Garcia Ryan M, Messerschmitt Patrick J, Ahn Nicholas U
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Feb;22(1):52-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181651bf6.
An analysis of websites, accessible to the public, was conducted pertaining to the lumbar artificial disc replacement.
The objective was to investigate the content of information available on the Internet pertaining to the lumbar artificial disc replacement.
The Internet is widely used by patients as an educational tool for health care information. Additionally, the Internet is used as a medium for direct-to-consumer marketing. Recent approval of the lumbar artificial disc replacement has led to the emergence of numerous websites offering information about this procedure. It is thought that patients can be influenced by information found on the Internet; therefore, it is imperative that this information be accurate and as complete as possible.
Three commonly used search engines were used to locate 105 (35/search engine) websites providing information about the lumbar artificial disc replacement. Each website was evaluated with regard to authorship and content.
Fifty-nine percent of the websites reviewed were authorized by a private physician group, 9% by an academic physician group, 6% by industry, 11% were news reports, and 15% were not otherwise categorized. Seventy-two percent offered a mechanism for direct contact and 30% provided clear patient selection criteria. Benefits were expressed in 87% of websites, whereas associated risks were described in 28% or less. European experiences were noted in 53%, whereas only 22% of websites detailed the current US experience.
The results of this study demonstrate that much of the content of Internet-derived information pertaining to the lumbar artificial disc replacement is potentially misleading. Until long-term data are available, patients should be cautioned when using the Internet as a source for health care information, particularly with regard to the lumbar artificial disc replacement.
对公众可访问的有关腰椎人工椎间盘置换术的网站进行了分析。
目的是调查互联网上有关腰椎人工椎间盘置换术的可用信息内容。
互联网被患者广泛用作获取医疗保健信息的教育工具。此外,互联网还被用作直接面向消费者的营销媒介。最近腰椎人工椎间盘置换术的获批导致出现了众多提供有关该手术信息的网站。人们认为患者可能会受到互联网上信息的影响;因此,这些信息必须准确且尽可能完整,这一点至关重要。
使用三个常用搜索引擎查找105个(每个搜索引擎35个)提供有关腰椎人工椎间盘置换术信息的网站。对每个网站的作者身份和内容进行了评估。
所审查的网站中,59%由私人医生团体授权,9%由学术医生团体授权,6%由行业授权,11%是新闻报道,15%未作其他分类。72%的网站提供了直接联系机制,30%提供了明确的患者选择标准。87%的网站提到了益处,而描述相关风险的网站占28%或更少。53%的网站提到了欧洲的经验,而只有22%的网站详细介绍了美国目前的经验。
本研究结果表明,许多源自互联网的有关腰椎人工椎间盘置换术的信息内容可能具有误导性。在获得长期数据之前,患者在将互联网作为医疗保健信息来源时应谨慎,尤其是有关腰椎人工椎间盘置换术的信息。