Dohar Joseph E, Roland Peter, Wall G Michael, McLean Celeste, Stroman David W
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Feb;25(2):287-91. doi: 10.1185/03007990802603072.
To compare treatment failure rates for the two major acute otitis externa (AOE) pathogens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, by topical therapy with ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CDex) or neomycin 0.35%/polymyxin B 10,000 IU/mL/hydrocortisone 1% (Cort) based on clinical and microbiological failure in patients positive for these pathogens at baseline.
A combined analysis was conducted from two similar, but non-identical clinical trials involving CDex vs. Cort. Outcomes of the combined efficacy analysis were treatment failure rates and antibiotic susceptibility values for P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. The raw data for the treatment failure rates from the two studies were combined to calculate the overall treatment failure rates of each treatment group. Chi-square tests of independence were conducted to assess differences in treatment failure rates between treatment groups.
Of the 789 patients with culture-positive ears prior to the initiation of therapy, 61.0% (n = 481) were positive for P. aeruginosa and 8.9% (n = 70) were positive for S. aureus. While treatment failure rates for S. aureus were similar for the two therapies, CDex had a significantly lower treatment failure rate than Cort (5.1 vs. 13.0%; p = 0.0044) for P. aeruginosa. All of the persisting P. aeruginosa and S. aureus isolates were susceptible to fluoroquinolones and neomycin/polymyxin B.
The analysis strength is dependent on pooled data from similar studies.
Ototopical ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% more effectively eradicates P. aeruginosa compared to Cort. Eradication of S. aureus by either drug was similar. These results favor CDex as a better first-line choice in the treatment of AOE compared to Cort.
根据基线时这些病原体呈阳性的患者的临床和微生物学治疗失败情况,比较两种主要的急性外耳道炎(AOE)病原体铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌经0.3%环丙沙星/0.1%地塞米松(CDex)或0.35%新霉素/10000 IU/mL多粘菌素B/1%氢化可的松(Cort)局部治疗后的治疗失败率。
对两项相似但不完全相同的涉及CDex与Cort的临床试验进行联合分析。联合疗效分析的结果是铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的治疗失败率及抗生素敏感性值。将两项研究中治疗失败率的原始数据合并,以计算每个治疗组的总体治疗失败率。进行独立性卡方检验以评估治疗组之间治疗失败率的差异。
在治疗开始前789例培养阳性耳的患者中,61.0%(n = 481)铜绿假单胞菌呈阳性,8.9%(n = 70)金黄色葡萄球菌呈阳性。虽然两种疗法对金黄色葡萄球菌的治疗失败率相似,但对于铜绿假单胞菌,CDex的治疗失败率显著低于Cort(5.1%对13.0%;p = 0.0044)。所有持续存在的铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌分离株对氟喹诺酮类和新霉素/多粘菌素B敏感。
分析力度取决于相似研究的汇总数据。
与Cort相比,0.3%环丙沙星/0.1%地塞米松更有效地根除铜绿假单胞菌。两种药物对金黄色葡萄球菌的根除效果相似。这些结果表明,与Cort相比,CDex作为AOE治疗的一线选择更佳。