Janet Nguyen L, May Abdel-Wahab, Akins Robin S
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb;32(1):27-9. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31817b6061.
We report the management and outcome of prostate sarcoma at 1 institution and analyze factors that may determine prognosis.
The medical records of 10 patients with prostate sarcoma were reviewed to identify symptoms at presentation, diagnostic procedures, and staging methods. Histology, grade, tumor size, stage, and treatment modality were analyzed. Overall survival was assessed.
Five patients had rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and five had other subtypes, including two with carcinosarcoma, two with high-grade sarcoma not-otherwise-specified, and one with leiyomyosarcoma. Eight patients presented with locally advanced disease and two with metastatic disease.The two metastatic patients received chemotherapy, and one also had hormonal ablation therapy. Of the eight with local disease, two had neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, one had surgery alone, one had surgery and postoperative radiation, one had radiation alone, and three had chemoradiation.Chemotherapy consisted of vincristine, adriamycin, and cyclophosphomide for rhabdomyosarcoma and of cisplatin, adriamycin, and ifosphamide for the other subtypes. Radiation dose ranged from 40 Gy to 55.8 Gy.The median survival follow-up of the study is 46.5 months. The median survival for the rhabdomyosarcoma subgroup and nonrhabdomyosarcoma subroup is 142 months and 24 months, respectively. There were three deaths, of which two had metastatic disease at presentation and one later developed distant metastases after having surgery alone. One patient developed a local recurrence 47 months after chemoradiation and was successfully salvaged with surgery.
In terms of tumor-related factors, the histologic subtype of prostate sarcoma appears to have prognostic significance. The overall survival for adults with non-RMS histologies is poor with a median survival of only 2 years. Pediatric patients with RMS faired much better with a median survival of over 10 years. We did not find any difference in outcome with regard to grade or tumor size. The presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis, however, is a poor predictor of outcome.In terms of treatment-related factors, surgery alone is inadequate treatment. One patient treated with surgery alone developed distant metastases 38 months later, then received chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, and died at 58 months. Patients who received combined modality treatment appear to fare better.Finally, these patients need long term follow-up. One patient developed a local recurrence 47 months after chemoradiation. This patient was successfully salvaged with surgery and is currently alive at 170 months.
我们报告了一家机构对前列腺肉瘤的管理及治疗结果,并分析了可能决定预后的因素。
回顾了10例前列腺肉瘤患者的病历,以确定就诊时的症状、诊断程序和分期方法。对组织学、分级、肿瘤大小、分期和治疗方式进行了分析。评估了总生存期。
5例为横纹肌肉瘤(RMS),5例为其他亚型,包括2例癌肉瘤、2例未另行指定的高级别肉瘤和1例平滑肌肉瘤。8例患者表现为局部晚期疾病,2例为转移性疾病。2例转移性患者接受了化疗,1例还接受了激素消融治疗。8例局部疾病患者中,2例接受了新辅助化疗和手术,1例仅接受了手术,1例接受了手术及术后放疗,1例仅接受了放疗,3例接受了放化疗。横纹肌肉瘤的化疗方案为长春新碱、阿霉素和环磷酰胺,其他亚型为顺铂、阿霉素和异环磷酰胺。放疗剂量范围为40 Gy至55.8 Gy。该研究的中位生存随访时间为46.5个月。横纹肌肉瘤亚组和非横纹肌肉瘤亚组的中位生存期分别为142个月和24个月。有3例死亡,其中2例就诊时为转移性疾病,1例在仅接受手术后出现远处转移。1例患者在放化疗后47个月出现局部复发,通过手术成功挽救。
就肿瘤相关因素而言,前列腺肉瘤的组织学亚型似乎具有预后意义。非RMS组织学类型的成年患者总生存期较差,中位生存期仅为2年。RMS的儿科患者预后要好得多,中位生存期超过10年。我们未发现分级或肿瘤大小对治疗结果有任何差异。然而,诊断时存在转移性疾病是预后不良的预测因素。就治疗相关因素而言,单纯手术治疗不足。1例仅接受手术治疗的患者在38个月后出现远处转移,随后接受了化疗和激素治疗,58个月时死亡。接受综合治疗的患者似乎预后更好。最后,这些患者需要长期随访。1例患者在放化疗后47个月出现局部复发。该患者通过手术成功挽救,目前存活170个月。