Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Nov;129(11):1473-81. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0822-z. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
Both, the stem shape and the implantation technique could influence the quality of the cement mantle surrounding femoral hip implants. We investigated which of these two factors is most important for the stem-cement-bone construct.
We compared morphological data of 22 straight Charnley-Kerboul and 18 anatomic Lubinus SPII plastic replicas implanted line-to-line with the broach or one size undersized in paired cadaver femora. Specimens were CT scanned and assessed with validated segmentation software.
According to a general linear model, the canal-filling capacity of the stem, the cement thickness, the amount of thin and deficient cement and cortical support to areas of weak cement, were exclusively related to the implantation technique. The anatomic shape of Lubinus stems did not improve centralization or alignment.
Stem shape was the most obvious difference between Lubinus SPII and Chanrley-Kerboul implants. However, comparing both, stem-broach sizing was the most important determining factor for the cemented stem construct.
股骨髋关节植入物的柄形状和植入技术都可能影响周围水泥覆盖层的质量。我们研究了这两个因素中哪一个对柄-水泥-骨结构最重要。
我们将 22 个直的 Charnley-Kerboul 和 18 个解剖 Lubinus SPII 塑料复制模型的形态数据与线对线植入的骨锉或小一尺寸的骨锉进行了比较,这些标本都经过 CT 扫描,并使用经过验证的分割软件进行了评估。
根据一般线性模型,柄的管腔填充能力、水泥厚度、薄弱水泥区域的薄水泥和不足水泥量以及皮质对水泥的支持,仅与植入技术有关。Lubinus 柄的解剖形状并不能改善中心定位或对齐。
柄形状是 Lubinus SPII 和 Charnley-Kerboul 植入物之间最明显的区别。然而,将两者进行比较,柄-骨锉尺寸是决定水泥柄结构的最重要因素。