Guedj Myriam, Sastre Maria Teresa Muñoz, Mullet Etienne, Sorum Paul Clay
Université du Mirail, Toulouse, France.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009 Mar-Apr;32(2):108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.01.003. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
When is it acceptable for a psychiatrist to break confidentiality to protect the wife of a potentially violent patient?
153 lay persons, 13 nursing personnel, 10 physicians, and 10 psychologists in France indicated this acceptability in 48 scenarios. The scenarios were all combinations of 5 factors: gravity of threat (death or beating), certainty of mental illness (certain or not), time spent talking with patient (considerable or little), his attitude toward psychotherapy (rejection, indecision, or acceptance), and whether the physician consulted an expert.
Lay people favored breaking confidentiality more than did nursing personnel or psychologists. Consulting an expert had greatest impact. Lay participants were composed of groups that found breaking confidentiality "always acceptable" (22 participants), "depending on many circumstances" (106), requiring "consultation with an expert" (31), and "never acceptable" (27).
Lay people in France are influenced by situational factors when deciding if a psychiatrist should break confidentiality to protect a patient's wife.
对于精神科医生而言,在何种情况下为保护潜在暴力患者的妻子而打破保密原则是可接受的?
法国的153名外行人、13名护理人员、10名医生和10名心理学家对48种情景下的这种可接受性进行了评估。这些情景是5个因素的所有组合:威胁的严重性(死亡或殴打)、精神疾病的确定性(确定或不确定)、与患者交谈的时间(长或短)、他对心理治疗的态度(拒绝、犹豫不决或接受)以及医生是否咨询了专家。
外行人比护理人员或心理学家更倾向于打破保密原则。咨询专家的影响最大。参与研究的外行人分为几类,其中认为打破保密原则“总是可接受的”(22名参与者)、“取决于多种情况”(106名)、需要“咨询专家”(31名)以及“永远不可接受”(27名)。
在决定精神科医生是否应打破保密原则以保护患者妻子时,法国的外行人会受到情境因素的影响。