Boggild Mike
The Walton Centre, Liverpool, UK.
J Neurol Sci. 2009 Feb 1;277 Suppl 1:S50-4. doi: 10.1016/S0022-510X(09)70014-0.
The recent emergence of 'higher efficacy/higher risk' therapies in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) asks questions of current treatment paradigms in this disorder. For those patients who present with very aggressive relapsing disease or early treatment failure on an interferon, a number of treatment options need to be considered. One such strategy is that of induction treatment regimens combining a short-course of an immunosuppressive drug to enable prompt control of inflammatory disease activity, followed by maintenance therapy with an immunomodulatory treatment. Immunosuppressants in general cannot be given over extended periods because of toxicity associated with cumulative exposure. However, in the short term, the risks associated with their use are probably less than those risks associated with inadequate control of relapse activity in aggressive onset disease. In particular, several groups have investigated the potential use of mitoxantrone induction followed by maintenance therapy with glatiramer acetate (GA). The evidence emerging from such studies suggests that brief immunosuppression with mitoxantrone followed by maintenance therapy with GA may provide a synergistic effect on control of disease activity and can be administered with an acceptable risk. The effectiveness of such induction regimens should encourage physicians to reconsider thresholds to define treatment failure on 'first-line' therapies, the criteria for acceptable disease control, as well as the relative place of induction and escalation treatment strategies in the management of RRMS.
复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)中“高效能/高风险”疗法的近期出现,引发了对该疾病当前治疗模式的质疑。对于那些表现为非常侵袭性的复发疾病或在干扰素治疗上早期治疗失败的患者,需要考虑多种治疗选择。一种这样的策略是诱导治疗方案,即联合使用短期免疫抑制药物以迅速控制炎症性疾病活动,随后采用免疫调节治疗进行维持治疗。一般来说,由于与累积暴露相关的毒性,免疫抑制剂不能长期使用。然而,在短期内,其使用相关的风险可能小于侵袭性发病疾病中复发活动控制不足所带来的风险。特别是,有几个研究小组探讨了米托蒽醌诱导治疗后再用醋酸格拉替雷(GA)进行维持治疗的潜在用途。此类研究得出的证据表明,米托蒽醌短期免疫抑制后再用GA进行维持治疗,可能对疾病活动的控制产生协同效应,并且可以在可接受的风险下给药。这种诱导方案的有效性应促使医生重新考虑定义“一线”疗法治疗失败的阈值、可接受疾病控制的标准,以及诱导和强化治疗策略在RRMS管理中的相对地位。