Kunkle Justin M, Walters Michael B, Kobe Richard K
Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Tree Physiol. 2009 May;29(5):715-23. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpp004. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
The fate of nitrogen (N) in senescing fine roots has broad implications for whole-plant N economies and ecosystem N cycling. Studies to date have generally shown negligible changes in fine root N per unit root mass during senescence. However, unmeasured loss of mobile non-N constituents during senescence could lead to underestimates of fine root N loss. For N fertilized and unfertilized potted seedlings of Populus tremuloides Michx., Acer rubrum L., Acer saccharum Marsh. and Betula alleghaniensis Britton, we predicted that the fine roots would lose mass and N during senescence. We estimated mass loss as the product of changes in root mass per length and root length between live and recently dead fine roots. Changes in root N were compared among treatments on uncorrected mass, length (which is independent of changes in mass per length), calcium (Ca) and corrected mass bases and by evaluating the relationships of dead root N as a function of live root N, species and fertilization treatments. Across species, from live to dead roots, mass decreased 28-40%, N uncorrected for mass loss increased 10-35%, N per length decreased 5-16%, N per Ca declined 14-48% and N corrected for mass declined 12-28%. Given the magnitude of senescence-related root mass loss and uncertainties about Ca dynamics in senescing roots, N loss corrected for mass loss is likely the most reliable estimate of N loss. We re-evaluated the published estimates of N changes during root senescence based on our values of mass loss and found an average of 28% lower N in dead roots than in fine roots. Despite uncertainty about the contributions of resorption, leaching and microbial immobilization to the net loss of N during root senescence, live root N was a strong and proportional predictor of dead root N across species and fertilization treatments, suggesting that live root N alone could be used to predict the contributions of senescing fine roots to whole-plant N economies and N cycling.
衰老细根中氮(N)的命运对整株植物的氮素经济和生态系统氮循环具有广泛影响。迄今为止的研究普遍表明,衰老过程中单位根质量的细根氮含量变化可忽略不计。然而,衰老过程中未测量的可移动非氮成分的损失可能导致对细根氮损失的低估。对于施氮和未施氮的盆栽颤杨(Populus tremuloides Michx.)、红枫(Acer rubrum L.)、糖枫(Acer saccharum Marsh.)和黄桦(Betula alleghaniensis Britton)幼苗,我们预测细根在衰老过程中会损失质量和氮。我们将质量损失估计为活细根与刚死亡细根之间单位长度根质量变化与根长度的乘积。通过在未校正质量、长度(与单位长度质量变化无关)、钙(Ca)和校正质量基础上比较各处理间根氮的变化,并评估死根氮作为活根氮、物种和施肥处理函数的关系。跨物种来看,从活根到死根,质量下降了28 - 40%,未校正质量损失的氮增加了10 - 35%,单位长度氮下降了5 - 16%,单位钙氮下降了14 - 48%,校正质量后的氮下降了12 - 28%。鉴于与衰老相关的根质量损失幅度以及衰老根中钙动态的不确定性,校正质量损失后的氮损失可能是氮损失最可靠的估计值。我们根据质量损失值重新评估了已发表的根衰老过程中氮变化的估计值,发现死根中的氮平均比细根中的氮低28%。尽管关于再吸收、淋溶和微生物固定对根衰老过程中氮净损失的贡献存在不确定性,但活根氮是跨物种和施肥处理的死根氮的一个强有力且成比例的预测指标,这表明仅活根氮就可用于预测衰老细根对整株植物氮素经济和氮循环的贡献。