Suppr超能文献

通过心房-肺静脉电图的主导频率分析可以预测由非肺静脉来源维持的阵发性心房颤动。

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation maintained by nonpulmonary vein sources can be predicted by dominant frequency analysis of atriopulmonary electrograms.

作者信息

Yokoyama Eriko, Osaka Toshiyuki, Takemoto Yoshio, Suzuki Tomoyuki, Ito Atsushi, Kamiya Kaichiro, Kodama Itsuo

机构信息

Division of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Shizuoka Saiseikai General Hospital, Oshika 1-1-1, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Jun;20(6):630-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01376.x. Epub 2009 Dec 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Increasing evidence suggests that high-frequency excitation in the pulmonary vein (PV) plays a dominant role in the maintenance of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in a certain population of patients, AF remains inducible after PV isolation (PVI). We sought to clarify whether dominant frequency (DF) analysis of atriopulmonary electrograms can predict paroxysmal AF maintained by non-PV sources.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty-one patients with paroxysmal AF (aged 59 +/- 12 years) were studied. Before PVI, bipolar electrograms during AF were recorded simultaneously from three PV ostia, the coronary sinus (CS), and the septum and free wall of the right atrium (RA). DF was obtained by fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis. AF was rendered noninducible after PVI in 39 of the 61 patients (noninducible group), but was still inducible in the remaining 22 (inducible group). Among the six recording sites, the highest DF was documented in the PV in all of the patients in the noninducible group; the maximum DF among the three PVs (PV-DF(max)) was higher than that among the CS and two RA sites (atrial DF(max); 7.2 +/- 1.0 Hz vs 5.8 +/- 0.7 Hz, P < 0.0001). In contrast, the highest DF was documented in the CS or RA in 45.5% of the patients in the inducible group; PV-DF(max) was comparable with atrial DF(max) (6.6 +/- 0.8 Hz vs 6.6 +/- 0.6 Hz). AF inducibility after PVI was predicted by a PV-to-atrial DF(max) gradient of <0.5 Hz, with a sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 89.7%.

CONCLUSION

Paroxysmal AF maintained by non-PV sources can be predicted by the PV-to-atrial DF gradient.

摘要

引言

越来越多的证据表明,肺静脉(PV)中的高频激动在阵发性心房颤动(AF)的维持中起主导作用。然而,在某些患者群体中,肺静脉隔离(PVI)后房颤仍可诱发。我们试图阐明心房-肺电图的主导频率(DF)分析是否能预测由非肺静脉来源维持的阵发性房颤。

方法与结果

对61例阵发性房颤患者(年龄59±12岁)进行了研究。在PVI之前,同时从三个肺静脉开口、冠状窦(CS)以及右心房(RA)的间隔和游离壁记录房颤期间的双极电图。通过快速傅里叶变换(FFT)分析获得DF。61例患者中有39例在PVI后房颤不能诱发(非诱发组),但其余22例仍可诱发(诱发组)。在六个记录部位中,非诱发组所有患者的最高DF均记录在肺静脉中;三个肺静脉中的最大DF(PV-DF(max))高于冠状窦和两个右心房部位的最大DF(心房DF(max));分别为7.2±1.0Hz和5.8±0.7Hz,P<0.0001。相比之下,诱发组45.5%的患者最高DF记录在冠状窦或右心房中;PV-DF(max)与心房DF(max)相当(6.6±0.8Hz对6.6±0.6Hz)。PVI后房颤的可诱发性可通过肺静脉至心房的DF(max)梯度<0.5Hz来预测,敏感性为90.9%,特异性为89.7%。

结论

由非肺静脉来源维持的阵发性房颤可通过肺静脉至心房DF梯度来预测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验