Suppr超能文献

先前的以自我为中心的知识对路径动觉学习的选择性影响。

Selective influence of prior allocentric knowledge on the kinesthetic learning of a path.

作者信息

Lafon Matthieu, Vidal Manuel, Berthoz Alain

机构信息

Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Perception et de l'Action (LPPA), CNRS Collège de France, 11 Place Marcelin Berthelot, 75005 Paris, France.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2009 Apr;194(4):541-52. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1728-2. Epub 2009 Feb 20.

Abstract

Spatial cognition studies have described two main cognitive strategies involved in the memorization of traveled paths in human navigation. One of these strategies uses the action-based memory (egocentric) of the traveled route or paths, which involves kinesthetic memory, optic flow, and episodic memory, whereas the other strategy privileges a survey memory of cartographic type (allocentric). Most studies have dealt with these two strategies separately, but none has tried to show the interaction between them in spite of the fact that we commonly use a map to imagine our journey and then proceed using egocentric navigation. An interesting question is therefore: how does prior allocentric knowledge of the environment affect the egocentric, purely kinesthetic navigation processes involved in human navigation? We designed an experiment in which blindfolded subjects had first to walk and memorize a path with kinesthetic cues only. They had previously been shown a map of the path, which was either correct or distorted (consistent shrinking or growing). The latter transformations were studied in order to observe what influence a distorted prior knowledge could have on spatial mechanisms. After having completed the first learning travel along the path, they had to perform several spatial tasks during the testing phase: (1) pointing towards the origin and (2) to specific points encountered along the path, (3) a free locomotor reproduction, and (4) a drawing of the memorized path. The results showed that prior cartographic knowledge influences the paths drawn and the spatial inference capacity, whereas neither locomotor reproduction nor spatial updating was disturbed. Our results strongly support the notion that (1) there are two independent neural bases underlying these mechanisms: a map-like representation allowing allocentric spatial inferences, and a kinesthetic memory of self-motion in space; and (2) a common use of, or a switching between, these two strategies is possible. Nevertheless, allocentric representations can emerge from the experience of kinesthetic cues alone.

摘要

空间认知研究描述了人类导航中记忆行进路径所涉及的两种主要认知策略。其中一种策略使用行进路线或路径基于动作的记忆(以自我为中心),这涉及动觉记忆、光流和情景记忆,而另一种策略则侧重于地图式的概观记忆(以客体为中心)。大多数研究分别探讨了这两种策略,但尽管我们通常会使用地图来想象旅程,然后再通过以自我为中心的导航继续前行,但却没有人试图展示它们之间的相互作用。因此,一个有趣的问题是:环境的先验以客体为中心的知识如何影响人类导航中涉及的以自我为中心的、纯粹动觉的导航过程?我们设计了一项实验,让蒙住眼睛的受试者首先仅通过动觉线索行走并记忆一条路径。他们之前已经看过这条路径的地图,该地图要么是正确的,要么是扭曲的(一致的缩小或放大)。研究后者的变换是为了观察扭曲的先验知识可能对空间机制产生什么影响。在沿着路径完成第一次学习行走后,他们必须在测试阶段执行几个空间任务:(1)指向起点和(2)沿着路径遇到的特定点,(3)自由运动再现,以及(4)绘制记忆的路径。结果表明,先验的地图知识会影响绘制的路径和空间推理能力,而动觉再现和空间更新均未受到干扰。我们的结果有力地支持了以下观点:(1)这些机制有两个独立的神经基础:一个类似地图的表征允许以客体为中心的空间推理,以及一个空间中自我运动的动觉记忆;(2)这两种策略的共同使用或切换是可能的。然而,以客体为中心的表征仅通过动觉线索的体验也可能出现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验