Harikrishnan S, Rajeev E, Tharakan Jaganmohan A, Titus Thomas, Ajit Kumar V K, Sivasankaran S, Krishnamoorthy K M, Nair Krishnakumar
Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Indian Heart J. 2008 May-Jun;60(3):215-22.
We investigated the safety and efficacy of combination therapy of extended release (ER) niacin and atorvastatin in patients with low HDL-C and compared the results with atorvastatin monotherapy.
This open label study recruited consecutive men and women who had coronary artery disease with HDL-C levels <35 mg/dL. These patients were already on atorvastatin therapy targeted to lower low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), for a minimum period of 6 months. Group 1, n = 104 (mean age 52.7 years) received ER niacin in addition to atorvastatin and group 2 (n = 106) continued on atorvastatin (mean age 52.3 years). ER niacin dose was built up to a maximum of 1.5 g and atorvastatin dose titrated according to LDL levels in both the groups. The lipoprotein levels at baseline were similar (p = NS).
At 9 +/- 1.8 months of follow-up, the mean dose of ER niacin was 1.3 g and atorvastatin 13.2 mg in group 1. In comparison, group 2 patients had mean atorvastatin dose of 15.9 mg. Patients in group 1 had significant elevation in HDL-C cholesterol (39.5 +/- 5.5 vs 35.7 +/- 4.5 mg/dL), reduction in total cholesterol (156.4 +/- 31 vs 164.5 +/- 39.3 mg/dL) and also LDL-C (88.9 +/- 28.3 vs 99.8 +/- 35.4 mg/dL) compared to group 2 (all p < 0.05). The magnitude of reduction in triglyceride levels was not significant between the groups (140.1 +/- 40.4 vs 145.2 +/- 46.5 mg/dL) (p = NS). No major adverse events or clinical myopathy occurred in either groups. Four patients (4%) discontinued ER niacin (2 due to gastro-intestinal symptoms and 2 due to worsening of diabetes). Flushing occurred in 3% patients, but none felt it to be troublesome.
Adding ER niacin to atorvastatin exhibited beneficial effects on lipid profile with significant elevation of HDL-C cholesterol and further lowering of LDL-C compared to monotherapy. This treatment offered better targeted therapy and was well tolerated with proper monitoring in Indian patients.
我们研究了缓释烟酸与阿托伐他汀联合治疗对低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)患者的安全性和有效性,并将结果与阿托伐他汀单药治疗进行比较。
这项开放标签研究招募了连续的患有冠状动脉疾病且HDL-C水平<35mg/dL的男性和女性。这些患者已经接受旨在降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的阿托伐他汀治疗,最短疗程为6个月。第1组,n = 104(平均年龄52.7岁),除阿托伐他汀外还接受缓释烟酸,第2组(n = 106)继续使用阿托伐他汀(平均年龄52.3岁)。两组中缓释烟酸剂量逐渐增加至最大1.5g,阿托伐他汀剂量根据LDL水平进行滴定。基线时脂蛋白水平相似(p =无显著性差异)。
在9±1.8个月的随访中,第1组缓释烟酸的平均剂量为1.3g,阿托伐他汀为13.2mg。相比之下,第2组患者阿托伐他汀的平均剂量为15.9mg。与第2组相比,第1组患者的HDL-C胆固醇显著升高(39.5±5.5对35.7±4.5mg/dL),总胆固醇降低(156.4±31对164.5±39.3mg/dL),LDL-C也降低(88.9±28.3对99.8±35.4mg/dL)(所有p<0.05)。两组间甘油三酯水平降低幅度无显著性差异(140.1±40.4对145.2±46.5mg/dL)(p =无显著性差异)。两组均未发生重大不良事件或临床肌病。4名患者(4%)停用缓释烟酸(2例因胃肠道症状,2例因糖尿病恶化)。3%的患者出现潮红,但无人觉得困扰。
与单药治疗相比,阿托伐他汀联合缓释烟酸对血脂谱有有益影响,HDL-C胆固醇显著升高,LDL-C进一步降低。这种治疗提供了更好的靶向治疗,在印度患者中经过适当监测后耐受性良好。