Kane Nolan C, King Matthew G
Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mol Ecol. 2009 Apr;18(8):1551-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04110.x. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
Numerous approaches have been developed to examine recent and historical gene flow between populations, but few studies have used empirical data sets to compare different approaches. Some methods are expected to perform better under particular scenarios, such as high or low gene flow, but this, too, has rarely been tested. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Saenz-Agudelo et al. (2009) apply assignment tests and parentage analysis to microsatellite data from five geographically proximal (2-6 km) and one much more distant (1500 km) panda clownfish populations, showing that parentage analysis performed better in situations of high gene flow, while their assignment tests did better with low gene flow. This unusually complete data set is comprised of multiple exhaustively sampled populations, including nearly all adults and large numbers of juveniles, enabling the authors to ask questions that in many systems would be impossible to answer. Their results emphasize the importance of selecting the right analysis to use, based on the underlying model and how well its assumptions are met by the populations to be analysed.
人们已经开发出许多方法来研究种群之间近期和历史上的基因流动,但很少有研究使用实证数据集来比较不同的方法。有些方法预计在特定情况下表现更好,比如高基因流动或低基因流动的情况,但这一点也很少得到检验。在本期《分子生态学》中,萨恩斯 - 阿古德洛等人(2009年)将归属测试和亲子关系分析应用于来自五个地理距离相近(2 - 6公里)和一个距离更远(1500公里)的熊猫小丑鱼种群的微卫星数据,结果表明亲子关系分析在高基因流动情况下表现更好,而他们的归属测试在低基因流动情况下表现更佳。这个异常完整的数据集由多个经过详尽采样的种群组成,包括几乎所有成年个体和大量幼体,这使得作者能够提出在许多系统中无法回答的问题。他们的结果强调了根据潜在模型以及待分析种群对其假设的满足程度来选择合适分析方法的重要性。