Carbonell Pablo, Nussinov Ruth, del Sol Antonio
Bioinformatics Research Unit, Research and Development Division, Fujirebio, Inc., Komiya-cho, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, Japan.
Proteomics. 2009 Apr;9(7):1744-53. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800425.
One of the challenges of the postgenomic era is to provide a more realistic representation of cellular processes by combining a systems biology description of functional networks with information on their interacting components. Here we carried out a systematic large-scale computational study on a structural protein-protein interaction network dataset in order to dissect thermodynamic characteristics of binding determining the interplay between protein affinity and specificity. As expected, interactions involving specific binding sites display higher affinities than those of promiscuous binding sites. Next, in order to investigate a possible role of modular distribution of hot spots in binding specificity, we divided binding sites into modules previously shown to be energetically independent. In general, hot spots that interact with different partners are located in different modules. We further observed that common hot spots tend to interact with partners exhibiting common binding motifs, whereas different hot spots tend to interact with partners with different motifs. Thus, energetic properties of binding sites provide insights into the way proteins modulate interactions with different partners. Knowledge of those factors playing a role in protein specificity is important for understanding how proteins acquire additional partners during evolution. It should also be useful in drug design.
后基因组时代的挑战之一是通过将功能网络的系统生物学描述与其相互作用成分的信息相结合,来更真实地呈现细胞过程。在此,我们对一个结构蛋白-蛋白相互作用网络数据集进行了系统的大规模计算研究,以剖析决定蛋白质亲和力与特异性相互作用的结合热力学特征。正如预期的那样,涉及特异性结合位点的相互作用比杂乱结合位点的相互作用具有更高的亲和力。接下来,为了研究热点的模块化分布在结合特异性中可能发挥的作用,我们将结合位点划分为先前已证明在能量上相互独立的模块。一般来说,与不同伙伴相互作用的热点位于不同模块中。我们进一步观察到,共同热点倾向于与表现出共同结合基序的伙伴相互作用,而不同热点倾向于与具有不同基序的伙伴相互作用。因此,结合位点的能量特性为蛋白质调节与不同伙伴相互作用的方式提供了见解。了解那些在蛋白质特异性中起作用的因素对于理解蛋白质在进化过程中如何获得额外伙伴很重要。它在药物设计中也应该会有用。