• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用正常模式分析破译MutS和MSH2-MSH6中的错配识别循环。

Deciphering the mismatch recognition cycle in MutS and MSH2-MSH6 using normal-mode analysis.

作者信息

Mukherjee Shayantani, Law Sean M, Feig Michael

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Biophys J. 2009 Mar 4;96(5):1707-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.071.

DOI:10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.071
PMID:19254532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3325129/
Abstract

Postreplication DNA mismatch repair is essential for maintaining the integrity of genomic information in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The first step in mismatch repair is the recognition of base-base mismatches and insertions/deletions by bacterial MutS or eukaryotic MSH2-MSH6. Crystal structures of both proteins bound to mismatch DNA reveal a similar molecular architecture but provide limited insight into the detailed molecular mechanism of long-range allostery involved in mismatch recognition and repair initiation. This study describes normal-mode calculations of MutS and MSH2-MSH6 with and without DNA. The results reveal similar protein flexibilities and suggest common dynamic and functional characteristics. A strongly correlated motion is present between the lever domain and ATPase domains, which suggests a pathway for long-range allostery from the N-terminal DNA binding domain to the C-terminal ATPase domains, as indicated by experimental studies. A detailed analysis of individual low-frequency modes of both MutS and MSH2-MSH6 shows changes in the DNA-binding domains coupled to the ATPase sites, which are interpreted in the context of experimental data to arrive at a complete molecular-level mismatch recognition cycle. Distinct conformational states are proposed for DNA scanning, mismatch recognition, repair initiation, and sliding along DNA after mismatch recognition. Hypotheses based on the results presented here form the basis for further experimental and computational studies.

摘要

复制后DNA错配修复对于维持原核生物和真核生物基因组信息的完整性至关重要。错配修复的第一步是细菌MutS或真核生物MSH2 - MSH6识别碱基错配和插入/缺失。与错配DNA结合的这两种蛋白质的晶体结构揭示了相似的分子结构,但对于错配识别和修复起始过程中涉及的远程变构详细分子机制提供的见解有限。本研究描述了有DNA和无DNA情况下MutS和MSH2 - MSH6的正常模式计算。结果揭示了相似的蛋白质灵活性,并表明了共同的动态和功能特征。杠杆结构域和ATP酶结构域之间存在强烈的相关运动,这表明了从N端DNA结合结构域到C端ATP酶结构域的远程变构途径,正如实验研究所表明的那样。对MutS和MSH2 - MSH6各自低频模式的详细分析显示,DNA结合结构域的变化与ATP酶位点相关,结合实验数据对其进行解释,从而得出完整的分子水平错配识别循环。针对DNA扫描、错配识别、修复起始以及错配识别后沿DNA滑动提出了不同的构象状态。基于此处呈现结果的假设构成了进一步实验和计算研究的基础。

相似文献

1
Deciphering the mismatch recognition cycle in MutS and MSH2-MSH6 using normal-mode analysis.使用正常模式分析破译MutS和MSH2-MSH6中的错配识别循环。
Biophys J. 2009 Mar 4;96(5):1707-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.071.
2
Contribution of Msh2 and Msh6 subunits to the asymmetric ATPase and DNA mismatch binding activities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh6 mismatch repair protein.Msh2和Msh6亚基对酿酒酵母Msh2-Msh6错配修复蛋白的不对称ATP酶活性和DNA错配结合活性的贡献。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2006 Feb 3;5(2):153-62. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.08.016. Epub 2005 Oct 7.
3
Conformational change in MSH2-MSH6 upon binding DNA coupled to ATPase activity.结合DNA时MSH2-MSH6的构象变化与ATP酶活性相关。
Biophys J. 2009 Jun 3;96(11):L63-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.012.
4
Mechanism of mismatch recognition revealed by human MutSβ bound to unpaired DNA loops.人源 MutSβ 结合非配对 DNA 环揭示错配识别机制。
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011 Dec 18;19(1):72-8. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2175.
5
Prerecognition Diffusion Mechanism of Human DNA Mismatch Repair Proteins along DNA: Msh2-Msh3 versus Msh2-Msh6.人类 DNA 错配修复蛋白沿 DNA 的前认知扩散机制:Msh2-Msh3 与 Msh2-Msh6 比较。
Biochemistry. 2020 Dec 29;59(51):4822-4832. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00669. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
6
The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G x T mismatch.DNA错配修复蛋白MutS与G×T错配结合的晶体结构。
Nature. 2000 Oct 12;407(6805):711-7. doi: 10.1038/35037523.
7
Crystal structure and biochemical analysis of the MutS.ADP.beryllium fluoride complex suggests a conserved mechanism for ATP interactions in mismatch repair.MutS.ADP.铍氟化物复合物的晶体结构和生化分析表明错配修复中ATP相互作用存在保守机制。
J Biol Chem. 2003 May 2;278(18):16088-94. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M213193200. Epub 2003 Feb 11.
8
Asymmetric recognition of DNA local distortion. Structure-based functional studies of eukaryotic Msh2-Msh6.DNA局部畸变的不对称识别。真核生物Msh2-Msh6基于结构的功能研究。
J Biol Chem. 2001 Dec 7;276(49):46225-9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100450200. Epub 2001 Oct 18.
9
The properties of Msh2-Msh6 ATP binding mutants suggest a signal amplification mechanism in DNA mismatch repair.Msh2-Msh6 ATP 结合突变体的性质表明在 DNA 错配修复中存在信号放大机制。
J Biol Chem. 2018 Nov 23;293(47):18055-18070. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.005439. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
10
Mismatch recognition-coupled stabilization of Msh2-Msh6 in an ATP-bound state at the initiation of DNA repair.在DNA修复起始阶段,错配识别与处于ATP结合状态的Msh2-Msh6的稳定化相偶联。
Biochemistry. 2003 Jul 1;42(25):7682-93. doi: 10.1021/bi034602h.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular dynamics of mismatch detection-How MutS uses indirect readout to find errors in DNA.错配检测的分子动力学-MutS 如何利用间接读取在 DNA 中找到错误。
Biophys J. 2023 Aug 8;122(15):3031-3043. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
2
Mutagenic Activation of Glutathione Peroxidase-4: Approaches toward Rational Design of Allosteric Drugs.谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶-4的诱变激活:变构药物合理设计的方法
ACS Omega. 2022 Aug 16;7(34):29587-29597. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c01289. eCollection 2022 Aug 30.
3
Prerecognition Diffusion Mechanism of Human DNA Mismatch Repair Proteins along DNA: Msh2-Msh3 versus Msh2-Msh6.人类 DNA 错配修复蛋白沿 DNA 的前认知扩散机制:Msh2-Msh3 与 Msh2-Msh6 比较。
Biochemistry. 2020 Dec 29;59(51):4822-4832. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00669. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
4
Molecular Mechanisms of DNA Replication and Repair Machinery: Insights from Microscopic Simulations.DNA复制与修复机制的分子机理:微观模拟的见解
Adv Theory Simul. 2019 May;2(5). doi: 10.1002/adts.201800191. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
5
Evolutionary Covariance Combined with Molecular Dynamics Predicts a Framework for Allostery in the MutS DNA Mismatch Repair Protein.进化协方差结合分子动力学预测MutS DNA错配修复蛋白变构的框架。
J Phys Chem B. 2017 Mar 9;121(9):2049-2061. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b11976. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
6
Long-Range Signaling in MutS and MSH Homologs via Switching of Dynamic Communication Pathways.MutS和MSH同源物中通过动态通信途径切换实现的长程信号传导。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Oct 21;12(10):e1005159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005159. eCollection 2016 Oct.
7
Mismatch binding, ADP-ATP exchange and intramolecular signaling during mismatch repair.错配修复过程中的错配结合、ADP-ATP交换及分子内信号传导
DNA Repair (Amst). 2016 Feb;38:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.11.017. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
8
Is thymidine glycol containing DNA a substrate of E. coli DNA mismatch repair system?含有胸苷二醇的DNA是大肠杆菌DNA错配修复系统的底物吗?
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 18;9(8):e104963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104963. eCollection 2014.
9
Differential mismatch recognition specificities of eukaryotic MutS homologs, MutSα and MutSβ.真核生物 MutS 同源物 MutSα和 MutSβ的错配识别特异性差异。
Biophys J. 2014 Jun 3;106(11):2483-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.026.
10
Modern aspects of the structural and functional organization of the DNA mismatch repair system.DNA 错配修复系统的结构和功能组织的现代方面。
Acta Naturae. 2013 Jul;5(3):17-34.

本文引用的文献

1
A New Method for Coarse-Grained Elastic Normal-Mode Analysis.一种用于粗粒度弹性正则模态分析的新方法。
J Chem Theory Comput. 2006;2(3):464-471. doi: 10.1021/ct050307u.
2
Dynamic basis for one-dimensional DNA scanning by the mismatch repair complex Msh2-Msh6.错配修复复合物Msh2-Msh6对一维DNA扫描的动态基础
Mol Cell. 2007 Nov 9;28(3):359-70. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.09.008.
3
Protein roadblocks and helix discontinuities are barriers to the initiation of mismatch repair.蛋白质障碍和螺旋不连续性是错配修复起始的障碍。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 31;104(31):12709-13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705129104. Epub 2007 Jul 9.
4
Structure of the human MutSalpha DNA lesion recognition complex.人类MutSα DNA损伤识别复合物的结构。
Mol Cell. 2007 May 25;26(4):579-92. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.04.018.
5
The effects of nucleotides on MutS-DNA binding kinetics clarify the role of MutS ATPase activity in mismatch repair.核苷酸对MutS与DNA结合动力学的影响阐明了MutS ATP酶活性在错配修复中的作用。
J Mol Biol. 2007 Mar 2;366(4):1087-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.092. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
6
Mechanisms in eukaryotic mismatch repair.真核生物错配修复机制。
J Biol Chem. 2006 Oct 13;281(41):30305-9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R600022200. Epub 2006 Aug 11.
7
Inhibition of Msh6 ATPase activity by mispaired DNA induces a Msh2(ATP)-Msh6(ATP) state capable of hydrolysis-independent movement along DNA.错配DNA对Msh6 ATP酶活性的抑制诱导了一种Msh2(ATP)-Msh6(ATP)状态,该状态能够沿DNA进行不依赖水解的移动。
Mol Cell. 2006 Apr 7;22(1):39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.010.
8
Dual role of MutS glutamate 38 in DNA mismatch discrimination and in the authorization of repair.MutS 谷氨酸 38 在 DNA 错配识别及修复授权中的双重作用。
EMBO J. 2006 Jan 25;25(2):409-19. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600936. Epub 2006 Jan 12.
9
Discrimination and versatility in mismatch repair.错配修复中的识别与通用性
DNA Repair (Amst). 2005 Dec 8;4(12):1463-74. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.09.002. Epub 2005 Oct 5.
10
Comparison of mode analyses at different resolutions applied to nucleic acid systems.应用于核酸系统的不同分辨率下的模式分析比较。
Biophys J. 2005 Nov;89(5):2939-49. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.065664. Epub 2005 Aug 12.