Duncan L W, Graham J H, Zellers J, Bright D, Dunn D C, El-Borai F E, Porazinska D L
University of Florida, IFAS, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL 33850 University of Florida, IFAS, Ft. Lauderdale Research and Education Center,3205 College Ave., Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314-7799.
J Nematol. 2007 Jun;39(2):176-89.
Factorial treatments of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) and composted, manure mulches were evaluated for two years in a central Florida citrus orchard to study the post-application biology of EPN used to manage the root weevil, Diaprepes abbreviatus. Mulch treatments were applied once each year to study the effects of altering the community of EPN competitors (free-living bactivorous nematodes) and antagonists (nematophagous fungi (NF), predaceous nematodes and some microarthro-pods). EPN were augmented once with Steinernema riobrave in 2004 and twice in 2005. Adding EPN to soil affected the prevalence of organisms at several trophic levels, but the effects were often ephemeral and sometimes inconsistent. EPN augmentation always increased the mortality of sentinel weevil larvae, the prevalence of free-living nematodes in sentinel cadavers and the prevalence of trapping NF. Subsequent to the insecticidal effects of EPN augmentation in 2004, but not 2005, EPN became temporarily less prevalent, and fewer sentinel weevil larvae died in EPN-augmented compared to non-augmented plots. Manure mulch had variable effects on endoparasitic NF, but consistently decreased the prevalence of trapping NF and increased the prevalence of EPN and the sentinel mortality. Both temporal and spatial abundance of NF were inversely related to the prevalence of Steinernema diaprepesi, whereas Heterorhabditis zealandica prevalence was positively correlated with NF over time. The number of weevil larvae killed by EPN was likely greatest in 2005, due in part to non-target effects of augmentation on the endemic EPN community in 2004 that occurred during a period of peak weevil recruitment into the soil.
在佛罗里达州中部的一个柑橘园中,对昆虫病原线虫(EPN)与堆肥、粪肥覆盖物的析因处理进行了为期两年的评估,以研究用于防治根象甲(Diaprepes abbreviatus)的EPN施用后的生物学特性。每年进行一次覆盖物处理,以研究改变EPN竞争者(自由生活的食细菌线虫)和拮抗物(捕食线虫真菌(NF)、捕食性线虫和一些小型节肢动物)群落的影响。2004年用里奥勇敢斯氏线虫(Steinernema riobrave)对EPN进行了一次增补,2005年进行了两次增补。向土壤中添加EPN影响了几个营养级生物的流行率,但这些影响往往是短暂的,有时也不一致。EPN增补始终会增加哨兵象甲幼虫的死亡率、哨兵尸体中自由生活线虫的流行率以及诱捕性NF的流行率。在200(此处原文有误,应为2004)年EPN增补产生杀虫效果之后,但2005年没有,EPN的流行率暂时降低,与未增补地块相比,在EPN增补地块中死亡的哨兵象甲幼虫更少。粪肥覆盖物对内生性NF有不同的影响,但始终会降低诱捕性NF的流行率,并增加EPN的流行率和哨兵死亡率。NF在时间和空间上的丰度均与迪亚普雷氏斯氏线虫(Steinernema diaprepesi)的流行率呈负相关,而随着时间的推移,新西兰异小杆线虫(Heterorhabditis zealandica)的流行率与NF呈正相关。2005年,EPN杀死的象甲幼虫数量可能最多,部分原因是2004年增补对本地EPN群落产生的非靶标效应发生在象甲向土壤中大量迁入的高峰期。