Shim Jaesool, Dutta Prashanta, Ivory Cornelius F
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Electrophoresis. 2009 Mar;30(5):723-31. doi: 10.1002/elps.200800728.
Ampholyte-based IEF is simulated for a 2-D horseshoe microchannel. The IEF model takes into account ionic-strength-dependent mobility corrections for both proteins and ampholytes. The Debye-Huckel-Henry model is employed to correct the protein mobilities and the Onsager-Debye-Huckel model is used to obtain effective mobilities of ampholytes from their limiting mobility. IEF simulations are conducted in the presence of 25 ampholytes (DeltapK=3.0) within a pH range of 6-9 under an electric field of 300 V/cm and using four proteins (pIs=6.49, 7.1, 7.93 and 8.6) focused in a 1-cm-long microchannel. The numerical results show that the concentrations of proteins and ampholytes are different when mobility corrections are considered but that the focusing positions remain the same regardless of mobility corrections. Our results also demonstrate that, unlike linear electrophoresis in which the bands deform significantly as they traverse a bend, during the transient portion of IEF racecourse dispersion is mitigated by focusing and, at focused-state, those bands that focus in the bend show no radial concentration dependence, i.e. they completely recover from racecourse dispersion, even within a tight turn.
基于两性电解质的等电聚焦(IEF)在二维马蹄形微通道中进行了模拟。IEF模型考虑了蛋白质和两性电解质的离子强度依赖性迁移率校正。采用德拜-休克尔-亨利模型校正蛋白质迁移率,并使用昂萨格-德拜-休克尔模型从极限迁移率中获得两性电解质的有效迁移率。在300 V/cm的电场下,在pH值为6至9的范围内,在存在25种两性电解质(ΔpK = 3.0)的情况下进行IEF模拟,并使用四种蛋白质(pI分别为6.49、7.1、7.93和8.6)在1厘米长的微通道中聚焦。数值结果表明,考虑迁移率校正时蛋白质和两性电解质的浓度不同,但聚焦位置无论是否进行迁移率校正都保持不变。我们的结果还表明,与线性电泳不同,在线性电泳中条带在穿过弯道时会显著变形,而在IEF过程的瞬态部分,聚焦可减轻泳道分散,并且在聚焦状态下,那些在弯道中聚焦的条带没有径向浓度依赖性,即它们即使在急转弯内也能从泳道分散中完全恢复。