Suppr超能文献

一年级课程的时间结构与课程考试成绩:解剖学和化学课程传统连续授课与集中授课的比较

Temporal structure of first-year courses and success at course exams: comparison of traditional continual and block delivery of anatomy and chemistry courses.

作者信息

Salopek Daniela, Lovrić Jasna, Hren Darko, Marusić Ana

机构信息

Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Sisters of Mercy University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Croat Med J. 2009 Feb;50(1):61-8. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2009.50.61.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate students' academic success at delivered in a traditional continual course, spread over the two semesters, or in alternating course blocks.

METHOD

We analyzed the data on exam grades for Anatomy and Chemistry courses in the first year of the curriculum for academic year 2001/02, with the traditional continual delivery of the courses (n=253 for chemistry and n=243 for anatomy), and academic year 2003/04, with block delivery of the courses (n=255 for Chemistry and n=260 for Anatomy). Grades from the final examination were analyzed only for students who sat the exam at the first available exam term and passed the course. For the Anatomy block course, grades at 2 interim written tests and 2 parts of the final exam (practical stage exam and oral exam) in each block were analyzed for students who passed all interim tests and the final exam.

RESULTS

There were no differences between two types of course delivery in the number of students passing the final examination at first attempt. There was a decrease in passing percentage for the two Anatomy block course student groups in 2003/04 (56% passing students in block 1 vs 40% in block 2, P=0.014). There was an increase in the average grades from 2001/02 to 2003/04 academic year due to an increase in Chemistry grades (F1,399=18.4, P<0.001, 2 x 2 ANOVA). There was no effect of the sequence of their delivery (F1,206=1.8, P=0.182, 2 x 2 ANOVA). There was also a significant difference in grades on interim assessments of Anatomy when it was delivered in the block format (F3,85=28.8, P<0.001, between-within subjects 2 x 4 ANOVA).

CONCLUSIONS

The type of course delivery was not associated with significant differences in student academic success in Anatomy and Chemistry courses in the medical curriculum. Students can successfully pass these courses when they are delivered either in a continual, whole year format or in a condensed time format of a course block, regardless of the number and type of courses preceding the block course.

摘要

目的

评估以传统连续课程形式(分布在两个学期)或交替课程模块形式授课时学生的学业成绩。

方法

我们分析了2001/02学年课程第一年解剖学和化学课程的考试成绩数据,该学年课程采用传统连续授课方式(化学课n = 253,解剖学课n = 243),以及2003/04学年课程采用模块授课方式(化学课n = 255,解剖学课n = 260)的数据。仅对在首个可用考试学期参加考试并通过课程的学生的期末考试成绩进行分析。对于解剖学模块课程,对通过所有中期测试和期末考试的学生,分析每个模块中2次中期笔试成绩以及期末考试的2部分成绩(实践阶段考试和口试)。

结果

两种授课方式下首次尝试通过期末考试的学生人数没有差异。2003/04学年两个解剖学模块课程学生组的及格率有所下降(模块1中及格学生为56%,模块2中为40%,P = 0.014)。由于化学成绩提高,2001/02学年至2003/04学年平均成绩有所上升(F1,399 = 18.4,P < 0.001,2×2方差分析)。授课顺序没有影响(F1,206 = 1.8,P = 0.182,2×2方差分析)。当解剖学以模块形式授课时,中期评估成绩也存在显著差异(F3,85 = 28.8,P < 0.001,组间 - 组内2×4方差分析)。

结论

授课方式类型与医学课程中解剖学和化学课程学生学业成绩的显著差异无关。无论模块课程之前的课程数量和类型如何,当课程以全年连续形式或课程模块的浓缩时间形式授课时,学生都能成功通过这些课程。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
The departments of radiology and anatomy: new symbiotic relations?放射科与解剖学系:新的共生关系?
Clin Radiol. 2008 Aug;63(8):918-20. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.03.004. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
3
High-quality learning: harder to achieve than we think?高质量学习:比我们想象的更难实现?
Med Educ. 2007 Jul;41(7):638-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02783.x.
8
Do students have sufficient knowledge of clinical anatomy?学生对临床解剖学有足够的了解吗?
Med Educ. 2005 Mar;39(3):326-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02096.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验