Conceição Teresa, Aires de Sousa Marta, de Lencastre Hermínia
Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Oeiras, Portugal.
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 May;47(5):1300-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01537-08. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
The present study evaluates the performance of the staphylococcal interspersed repeat unit (SIRU) method applied to a diverse collection of 104 Staphylococcus aureus isolates previously characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), spa typing, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec typing for methicillin-resistant S. aureus. The SIRU method distributed the 104 strains into 81 SIRU profiles that could be clustered into 12 groups and 29 singletons. The discriminatory power of the method at the profile level, translated by Simpson's index of diversity (SID), was similar to that of PFGE subtyping (SID = 99.23% versus 99.85%) and slightly higher than that of spa typing (SID = 97.61%). At the group level, the SIRU SID (93.24%) was lower than that of PFGE typing (95.41%) but higher than that of MLST (SID = 91.77%). The adjusted Rand (AR) coefficient showed that SIRU typing at the group level had the highest congruence with MLST (AR = 0.5736) and with clonal complex (CC) (AR = 0.4963) but the lowest congruence with PFGE subtype (AR = 0.0242). The Wallace coefficient indicated that in the present collection, two strains with the same SIRU profile have a 100% probability of belonging to the same CC, a 90% probability of sharing the same spa type, and an 83% probability of being classified in the same sequence type. The high discriminatory power of the SIRU method, along with its apparent concordance with MLST results, makes it potentially valuable for S. aureus short-term epidemiological investigations and population dynamics as well.
本研究评估了葡萄球菌散布重复单位(SIRU)方法在104株金黄色葡萄球菌不同菌株集合中的表现,这些菌株先前已通过脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)、spa分型、多位点序列分型(MLST)以及耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的葡萄球菌盒式染色体mec分型进行了鉴定。SIRU方法将这104株菌株分为81个SIRU谱型,这些谱型可聚类为12个组和29个单株。该方法在谱型水平上的鉴别力,通过辛普森多样性指数(SID)来衡量,与PFGE亚型分型相似(SID分别为99.23%和99.85%),略高于spa分型(SID = 97.61%)。在组水平上,SIRU的SID(93.24%)低于PFGE分型(95.41%),但高于MLST(SID = 91.77%)。调整后的兰德(AR)系数表明,组水平上的SIRU分型与MLST的一致性最高(AR = 0.5736),与克隆复合体(CC)的一致性也较高(AR = 0.4963),但与PFGE亚型的一致性最低(AR = 0.0242)。华莱士系数表明,在本菌株集合中,具有相同SIRU谱型的两株菌株有100%的概率属于同一CC,有90%的概率共享相同的spa型,有83%的概率被归类为相同的序列型。SIRU方法的高鉴别力及其与MLST结果的明显一致性,使其在金黄色葡萄球菌的短期流行病学调查和种群动态研究中具有潜在价值。