Donoghue Aaron J, Durbin Dennis R, Nadel Frances M, Stryjewski Glenn R, Kost Suzanne I, Nadkarni Vinay M
Division of Emergency Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Mar;25(3):139-44. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31819a7f90.
To assess the effect of high-fidelity simulation (SIM) on cognitive performance after a training session involving several mock resuscitations designed to teach and reinforce Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) algorithms.
Pediatric residents were randomized to high-fidelity simulation (SIM) or standard mannequin (MAN) groups. Each subject completed 3 study phases: (1) mock code exercises (asystole, tachydysrhythmia, respiratory arrest, and shock) to assess baseline performance (PRE phase), (2) a didactic session reviewing PALS algorithms, and (3) repeated mock code exercises requiring identical cognitive skills in a different clinical context to assess change in performance (POST phase). SIM subjects completed all 3 phases using a high-fidelity simulator (SimBaby, Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway), and MAN subjects used SimBaby without simulated physical findings (ie, as a standard mannequin). Performance in PRE and POST was measured by a scoring instrument designed to measure cognitive performance; scores were scaled to a range of 0 to 100 points. Improvement in performance from PRE to POST phases was evaluated by mixed modeling using a random intercept to account for within subject variability.
Fifty-one subjects (SIM, 25; MAN, 26) completed all phases. The PRE performance was similar between groups. Both groups demonstrated improvement in POST performance. The improvement in scores between PRE and POST phases was significantly better in the SIM group (mean [SD], 11.1 [4.8] vs. 4.8 [1.7], P = 0.007).
The use of high-fidelity simulation in a PALS training session resulted in improved cognitive performance by pediatric house staff. Future studies should address skill and knowledge decays and team dynamics, and clearly defined and reproducible outcome measures should be sought.
评估高保真模拟(SIM)对经过一系列旨在教授和强化儿科高级生命支持(PALS)算法的模拟复苏训练课程后认知表现的影响。
将儿科住院医师随机分为高保真模拟(SIM)组或标准人体模型(MAN)组。每位受试者完成3个研究阶段:(1)模拟代码练习(心脏停搏、快速性心律失常、呼吸骤停和休克)以评估基线表现(PRE阶段),(2)一次讲授PALS算法的课程,以及(3)在不同临床背景下进行需要相同认知技能的重复模拟代码练习以评估表现变化(POST阶段)。SIM组受试者使用高保真模拟器(挪威斯塔万格Laerdal Medical公司的SimBaby)完成所有3个阶段,MAN组受试者使用无模拟体格检查结果的SimBaby(即作为标准人体模型)。PRE和POST阶段的表现通过一种旨在测量认知表现的评分工具进行测量;分数范围为0至100分。通过使用随机截距的混合模型评估从PRE阶段到POST阶段表现的改善情况,以考虑受试者内部的变异性。
51名受试者(SIM组25名;MAN组26名)完成了所有阶段。两组的PRE表现相似。两组在POST阶段表现均有改善。SIM组在PRE和POST阶段之间的分数改善明显更好(均值[标准差],11.1[4.8]对4.8[1.7],P = 0.007)。
在PALS训练课程中使用高保真模拟可提高儿科住院医师的认知表现。未来的研究应关注技能和知识的衰退以及团队动态,并应寻求明确界定且可重复的结果测量方法。